Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Print ISSN: 2395-1443

Online ISSN: 2395-1451

CODEN : IJCEKF

Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (IJCEO) is open access, a peer-reviewed medical journal, published quarterly, online, and in print, by the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF) since 2015. To fulfil our aim of rapid dissemination of knowledge, we publish articles ‘Ahead of Print’ on acceptance. In addition, the journal allows free access (Open Access) to its content, which is likely to attract more readers and citations of articles published in IJCEO. Manuscripts must be prepared in more...

Article type

Original Article


Article page

333- 338


Authors Details

S Ravi Chaitanya*, Meenakshi Ravindran, Anitha Venugopal


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files

   






Article statistics

Viewed: 624

PDF Downloaded: 391


Comparative study on incidence of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) between conventional and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)


Original Article

Author Details : S Ravi Chaitanya*, Meenakshi Ravindran, Anitha Venugopal

Volume : 7, Issue : 2, Year : 2021

Article Page : 333-338

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijceo.2021.066



Suggest article by email

Get Permission

Abstract

Aim: To compare incidence of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) in patients after microkeratome and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using ultrasound B-scan.
Design: Prospective, non-randomised, comparative and interventional hospital based study.
Methods: This study was performed on 138 eyes of 69 patients, 64 eyes in microkeratome group and 74 eyes in femtosecond laser group for a period of 10 months from December 2017 to October 2018. The mean age of patients in microkeratome group was 23.34 years and in femtosecond laser group was 23.19 years. All patients in both the groups underwent one of the two procedure. Patients were assessed for subjective and objective refraction, presence of PVD, subjective complaints of floaters and axial length changes at each visit.
Results: At 1 week and 1 month postoperative period there was no PVD in either of the groups and none of the patients complained about disturbing floaters. At one week postoperative period, 17 eyes (26.5%) in microkeratome group and 22 eyes (29.6%) in femtosecond laser group had residual refraction ranging from -0.25D to -0.75D. The changes in axial length following surgery was 0.08 ± 0.08mm in microkeratome group and 0.1 ± 0.07mm in femtosecond laser group at one month.
Conclusion: Our study did not demonstrate any difference between both the procedures with respect to posterior segment complications. Patients in our study are relatively younger compared to other studies and hence, age of the patient undergoing LASIK may affect the incidence of PVD.
Key message: Both microkeratome assisted LASIK and femtosecond assisted LASIK were comparable with respect to posterior segment complications. The mean age of patients in this study is assumed to have an effect on outcome. Whereas axial length, power of the eye, procedure opted did not significantly have any impact on outcome. A larger population with longer follow up is needed in Indian population to conclude our results.


Keywords: Laser in situ keratomileusis, Posterior vitreous detachment, Refractive surgery.


How to cite : Chaitanya S R, Ravindran M, Venugopal A, Comparative study on incidence of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) between conventional and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Indian J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2021;7(2):333-338

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.