Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in ophthalmology: unveiling the ultrastructure of the ocular surface

References

1. Versura P, Maltarello MC. The role of scanning electron microscopy in ophthalmic science. Scanning Microsc. 1988;2(3):1695–723.
2. Cohen Hyams T, Mam K, Killingsworth MC. Scanning electron microscopy as a new tool for diagnostic pathology and cell biology. Micron. 2020;130:102797.
3. Messmer EM. Pathophysiology of dry eye disease and novel therapeutic targets. Exp Eye Res. 2022;217:108944.
4. Troisi M, Caruso C, D'Andrea L, Rinaldi M, Piscopo R, Troisi S, et al. Compatibility of a new ocular surface dye with disposable and bi-weekly soft contact lenses: an experimental study. Life (Basel). 2024;14(6):653.
5. Troisi M, Del Prete S, Troisi S, Del Prete A, Bellucci C, Marasco D, et al. The role of scanning electron microscopy in the evaluation of conjunctival microvilli as an early biomarker of ocular surface health: a literature review. J Clin Med. 2024;13(24):7569.
6. Pfister RR. The normal surface of conjunctiva epithelium. A scanning electron microscopic study. Invest Ophthalmol. 1975;14(4):267–79.
7. Cennamo GL, Del Prete A, Forte R, Cafiero G, Del Prete S, Marasco D. Impression cytology with scanning electron microscopy: a new 370 Troisi et al. / Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2025;11(3):368–370 method in the study of conjunctival microvilli. Eye (Lond). 2008;22(1):138–43.
8. Troisi M, Del Prete S, Troisi S, Marasco D, Rinaldi M, Costagliola C. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluation of the ultrastructural effects on conjunctival epithelial cells of a new multiple-action artificial tear containing cross-linked hyaluronic acid, cationic liposomes and trehalose. Biomedicines. 2024;12(9):1945.
9. Troisi M, Del Prete S, Troisi S, Rinaldi M, Marasco D, Costagliola C. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluation of conjunctival microvillar regeneration in dry eye patients treated with a new multiple-acting tear substitute. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024;65(9):PB0054.
10. Troisi M, Del Prete S, Troisi S, Marasco D, Costagliola C. Residence time and ultrastructural effects of a new formulation of multiple-action tear substitute: preliminary results at scanning electron microscopy (SEM) examination. Acta Ophthalmol. 2025;103. doi:10.1111/aos.17228
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ung L, Bispo PJM, Shanbhag SS, Gilmore MS, Chodosh J. The persistent dilemma of microbial keratitis: Global burden, diagnosis, and antimicrobial resistance. Surv Ophthalmol. 2019;64(3):255–71.
12. Singh RB, Das S, Chodosh J, Sharma N, Zegans ME, Kowalski RP, et al. Paradox of complex diversity: challenges in the diagnosis and management of bacterial keratitis. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2022;88:101028.
13. Bergmans L, Moisiadis P, Van Meerbeek B, Quirynen M, Lambrechts P. Microscopic observation of bacteria: review highlighting the use of environmental SEM. Int Endod J. 2005;38(11):775–88.
14. Troisi M, Del Prete S, Troisi S, Marasco D, Costagliola C. Scanning electron microscopy of conjunctival scraping: Our experience in the diagnosis of infectious keratitis with negative culture tests. Reports. 2023;6(1):10.
15. Troisi M, Del Prete S, Troisi S, Marasco D, Costagliola C. Correlative microscopy (CLEM) of tarsal conjunctival scraping: A new opportunity in the diagnosis of microbial keratitis. Acta Ophthalmol, 2024;102(S279).
16. Troisi M, Del Prete S, Troisi S, Marasco D, Costagliola C. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of conjunctival scraping for the diagnosis of atypical cases of Acanthamoeba in culture-negative keratoconjunctivitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024;65(7):4916.
17. Troisi M, Prete SD, Troisi S. Comment on Cabrera-Aguas, M.; Watson, S.L. Updates in Diagnostic Imaging for Infectious Keratitis: A Review. Diagnostics 2023;13: 3358. Diagnostics 2025;15(2):170.
18. Relucenti M, Familiari G, Donfrancesco O, Taurino M, Li X, Chen R, et al. Microscopy methods for biofilm imaging: focus on SEM and VP-SEM pros and cons. Biology (Basel). 2021;10(1):51.
19. Arunachalam K, Davoodbasha M. Imaging bacteria and biofilm by field emission scanning electron microscopy. In: Nag M, Lahiri D, editors. Analytical methodologies for biofilm research. New York, NY: Springer; 2021.
20. Cennamo G, Montorio D, Del Prete S, Del Prete A, Cennamo G. Anterior-segment optical coherence tomography and scanning electron microscopy to evaluate corneal epithelial changes in patients undergoing glaucoma therapy. Cornea. 2018;37(12):1522–
21. Forte R, Cennamo G, Del Prete S, Cesarano I, Del Prete A. Scanning electron microscopy of corneal epithelium in soft contact lens wearers. Cornea 2010;29(7):732–6.
22. Weng S, Liu M, Yang X, Liu F, Zhou Y, Lin H, et al. Evaluation of human corneal lenticule quality after smile with different cap thicknesses using scanning electron microscopy. Cornea. 2018;37(1):59–65.
23. Noecker RJ, Herrygers LA, Anwaruddin R. Corneal and conjunctival changes caused by commonly used glaucoma medications. Cornea. 2004;23(5):490–6.
24. Caruso C, Costagliola C, Troisi S, Epstein RL. Compaction of very thin corneas from ultraviolet a riboflavin-vitamin E transepithelial cross-linking. Exp Eye Res. 2021;205:108484.
25. Panda A, Vanathi M, Kumar A, Dash Y, Priya S. Corneal graft rejection. Surv Ophthalmol. 2007;52(4):375–96.
26. Rocha de Lossada C, Rachwani Anil R, Lacorzana Rodríguez J, Borroni D, Peraza-Nieves J. Goblet cell anatomy visualization by scanning electron microscopy. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;1(2):161.