Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Print ISSN: 2395-1443

Online ISSN: 2395-1451

CODEN : IJCEKF

Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (IJCEO) is open access, a peer-reviewed medical journal, published quarterly, online, and in print, by the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF) since 2015. To fulfil our aim of rapid dissemination of knowledge, we publish articles ‘Ahead of Print’ on acceptance. In addition, the journal allows free access (Open Access) to its content, which is likely to attract more readers and citations of articles published in IJCEO. Manuscripts must be prepared in more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 150

PDF Downloaded: 30


Get Permission Shah, Dave, Shah, Shah, and Gajjar: Comprehensive study on the incidence and impact of ophthalmological manifestations in head injuries in western India


Introduction

Head injuries, affecting 200-300 individuals per 100,000 annually, often present with ocular manifestations, significantly contributing to global visual disability.1 Ocular trauma stands out as a leading cause of blindness, impacting over half a million individuals worldwide, with a notable prevalence in developing nations. The demographic most affected by these injuries are children and young adults, amplifying the socioeconomic implications associated with such incidents. Common ophthalmic findings in head injury cases include periorbital ecchymosis, subconjunctival hemorrhage, pupillary abnormalities, and retinal detachments, among others.2 Unfortunately, these ocular signs are sometimes overlooked initially, leading to delayed ophthalmic evaluation and potential complications. Early recognition and correlation of these findings are crucial for accurately localizing the injury site, ongoing assessment, and determining patient prognosis.3 The implementation of helmets and other protective measures within communities has shown a significant reduction in road traffic accidents, subsequently lowering the incidence of head injuries and the associated visual morbidity.4, 5 This preventive approach highlights the importance of injury prevention strategies in safeguarding individuals from the devastating consequences of head trauma on ocular health.

Materials and Methods

The study was conducted in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) and was approved by Local Ethics Committee of the institute. One hundred fifty patients presenting with head injuries associated with ocular manifestations were recruited at our trauma center, Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad. Written and informed consent was obtained from the patient or their relative. Visual acuity was assessed using methods such as counting fingers or, where possible, Snellen chart examination. The anterior segment was examined using a torchlight, with slit lamp examination conducted if feasible. Evaluation of the posterior segment was carried out using direct and indirect ophthalmoscopy or ultrasonography as required. Radiological imaging (CT scan/MRI) was utilized as needed and correlated with clinical findings. Detailed documentation of all findings was performed for both eyes. Follow-up assessments were conducted on day 3, day 7, and at 1 month post-injury to monitor patient progress.

Inclusion criteria

Patients with head injury of all age and sex having ocular manifestations.

Exclusion criteria

Patient who cannot give consent for participation in this study or unwilling for examination.

Data was analysed and compared by using appropriate statistical test SPSS 20.0 Recorded information was entered in the Microsoft excel worksheet.

Observation and Results

150 patients of Head Injury with ocular manifestations were included in our study after taking written and informed consent.

Table 1

Age group distribution

Frequency

Percent

1-10

7

4.67

11-20

23

15.33

21-30

48

32.00

31-40

27

18.00

41-50

31

20.67

51-60

7

4.67

61-70

6

4.00

71-80

1

0.67

Total

150

100.0

Age of patients ranged from 2 to 72 years with a mean of 32.79 years (+-14.55 years). Young Adult males (11-30 years) were the major group who sustained head injury. i.e., 71 of the 150 of head injury cases. (Table 1) The incidence of head injury was less during childhood, peaked in the third decades of life, and thereafter declined.

Out of 150 cases of head injury, 126 cases (84%) were Male and 24(16%) were Female.(Figure 1) The vulnerability of the young males is due to the increased association with outdoor activities.

Figure 1

Gender distribution

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/bdf24300-2e90-420a-871d-cf1e0d58682fimage1.png

Table 2

Mode of injury

Mode of Injury

Frequency

Percent

Assault

15

13.39

Fall down

18

16.07

RTA

117

78.0

Total

150

100.0

Figure 2

Mode of injury

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/bdf24300-2e90-420a-871d-cf1e0d58682fimage2.png

Road Traffic Accidents (RTA) was the most common cause of head injury in 117 cases (78%) followed by Fall down in 18 cases (16.07%). In remaining 15 patients cause of head injury is Assault (13.39%). (Table 2 and Figure 2)

Table 3

History of LOC present or not

H/O Loss of Consciousness (LOC)

Frequency

Percent

No

72

48.0

Yes

78

52.0

Total

150

100.0

Table 4

Use of protective measures or not

Use of protective measures

Frequency

Percent

No

114

75.33

Yes (Helmet)

32

21.33

Yes (Seatbelt)

4

2.67

Total

150

100.0

This study highlights the low prevalence of helmet and seatbelt use and documents the potential reduction in the risk of head injuries if this risk factor was addressed. Out of 150 cases 36 cases (24%) used protective gears.(Table 4)

Table 5

TLE/SLE on first presentation

Ocular findings

Unilateral

Bilateral

Total

Number of Patients

% of Total Patients

Number of Patients

% of Total Patients

Echymosis

47

27.33

62

48.44

109

Sub-Conjuctival hemorrhage

27

15.70

4

3.13

31

Conjuctival chemosis

8

4.66

6

4.69

14

Aswnl

62

36.05

56

43.75

118

Extraocular movements restricted

4

2.33

0

0

4

Globe rupture

1

0.59

0

0

1

Hyphema

4

2.33

0

0

4

Laceration of lower eyelid

3

1.75

0

0

3

Laceration of upper eyelid

6

3.51

0

0

6

Proptosis

4

2.33

0

0

4

Traumatic iridodialysis

3

1.75

0

0

3

Traumatic third nerve Palsy

1

0.59

0

0

1

Traumatic cataract

2

1.17

0

0

2

Total

172

128

300

Figure 3

TLE/SLE on first presentation

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/f7c60353-4782-4443-8540-504c724ba2c6/image/97d8be9e-bd12-4838-844b-d06f051dac9d-uimage.png

Incidence of ocular manifestations in our study is periorbital Echymosis (36.34%), Sub-conjunctival hemorrhage (10.34%), Conjunctival chemosis (4.67%), Laceration of Upper eyelid (2%), Hyphema (1.34%), EOM restricted (1.34%), Laceration of lower eyelid (1%), Proptosis (1%), Traumatic iridodialysis (1%), Traumatic cataract (0.67%), Globe rupture (0.34%), Traumatic third nerve palsy (0.34%).

Table 6

Pupillary reaction on first presentation

Ocular Findings

Unilateral

Bilateral

Total

No. of Patients

% of Patients

No. of Patients

% of Patients

DNS

2

3.33

0

0

2

IRR/S/S/NR- L

1

1.67

0

0

1

N/S/S/R-L

30

50

238

99.17

268

RAPD

13

21.67

0

0

13

SD/NR-L

13

21.67

2

0.83

15

MIOSIS

1

1.67

0

0

1

Total

60

20

240

80

300

Table 7

Posterior segment assessment on first presentation

Ocular Findings

Unilateral

Bilateral

Total

No. of Patients

% of Patients

No. of Patients

% of Patients

Berlin's Edema

5

5.69

4

1.89

9

Papilloedema

0

0

10

4.72

10

WNL

43

48.87

198

93.4

241

Choroidal Rupture

2

2.28

0

0

2

Details Not Seen

5

5.69

0

0

5

Optic Nerve Avulsion

2

2.28

0

0

2

Retinal Hemorrhage

3

3.41

0

0

3

Retinal Tear

1

1.14

0

0

1

Traumatic Macular Hole

1

1.14

0

0

1

Traumatic Optic Neuropathy

10

11.37

0

0

10

Retinal Detachment

3

3.42

0

0

3

Vitreous Hemorrhage

10

11.37

0

0

10

Terson’s Syndrome

2

2.28

0

0

2

Total

88

29.33

212

70.67

300

Table 8

Showing visual acuity on presentation, day -3, day-7 and at 1 month

Visual Acuity

At presentation

At 3& 7th day

At 1 month

RE

6/6-6/9

101

110

6/12-6/18

7

6/24-6/60

4

15

CF1M- HM+PL+PR+4

107

28

15

No PL

1

2

2

Uncooperative

42

15

1

LE

6/6-6/9

119

132

6/12-6/18

4

6/24-6/60

4

4

CF1M- HM+PL+PR+4

107

11

6

No PL

1

1

3

Uncooperative

42

15

1

Table 9

Impact of usage of protective measure on visual outcome

Visual Acuity

Total

>=6/60

<6/60

Use of Protective Measure

Yes

31

1

32

No

94

24

118

Total

125

25

150

[i] Chi square: 5.371; p value=0.020

Out of 150 patients of head injury only 32 patients had history of usage of protective gears and out of them 31 cases having good visual outcome (Table 9).

Discussion

Head injuries are defined as cases involving brain involvement evidenced by loss of consciousness, post-traumatic amnesia, neurological signs, or skull fractures. These injuries often affect the eyes, leading to neuro-ophthalmic deficits. While ophthalmologists typically focus on obvious ocular issues like contusions and lacerations, subtle manifestations can be equally crucial yet may be overlooked, especially in patients with reduced consciousness or concurrent injuries.6

This study examines ocular findings during the acute phase of head injury, including physical ocular trauma, orbital fractures, and neuro-ophthalmic issues. A comprehensive ocular assessment significantly contributes to understanding the injury's severity, prognosis, and ocular motor involvement, which are vital for effective rehabilitation.7

Pupillary signs play a critical role in indicating injury site and severity, as well as predicting prognosis. They help localize supratentorial injuries, hemorrhages, and pontine lesions, with Hutchison's pupillary signs signaling the need for urgent intervention.8 Early identification of these signs could logically reduce subsequent morbidity and mortality rates.

In our study age of patients ranged from 2 to 72 years with a mean of 32.79 years (+-14.55 years). Young Adult males (16-30 years) were the major group who sustained head injury. i.e., 71 of the 150 of head injury cases. The incidence of head injury was less during childhood, peaked in the third decades of life, and thereafter declined. Out of 150 cases of head injury, 126 cases (84%) were male and 24(16%) were female. These findings align with those of other studies. For instance, Kulkarni et al.3 demonstrated that young adult males aged 21–30 are particularly vulnerable, while Odebode et al. identified a peak occurrence during the third decade of life (21–30 years).9 Sharma et al. observed a peak vulnerability among individuals aged 21–40 years. This heightened risk among young people is attributed to their increased engagement in outdoor activities.4

Road Traffic Accidents (RTA) was the most common cause of head injury in 117 cases (78%) followed by Fall down in 18 cases (16.07%). In remaining 15 patients cause of head injury is Assault (13.39%) other studies also showed almost similar observations. Raju et al reported 47.5% of cases because of RTA and 32.5% of cases due to fall from height.10

Incidence of ocular manifestations in our study is Periorbital Echymosis (36.34%), Sub-conjunctival Hemorrhage (10.34%), Conjunctival Chemosis (4.67%), Laceration of Upper Eyelid (2%), Hyphema (1.34%), EOM restricted (1.34%), Laceration of Lower Eyelid (1%), Proptosis (1%), Traumatic Iridodialysis (1%), Traumatic Cataract(0.67%), Globe Rupture (0.34%), Traumatic Third Nerve Palsy (0.34%). Periorbital ecchymosis was 22%-27% in other studies. The incidence of subconjunctival haemorrhage was 10.58%. Pupillary abnormalities were found in 7.95% as in other studies.11

Rehabilitation of the head injury patient is much more difficult if the visual system is not efficient. Head injury patients may be difficult to examine because of cognitive and communication disorders. A complete assessment may include evaluation of the eye, refraction, and examination of ocular motility, accommodation, vergence, stereopsis, visual perception, and visual fields.12, 13

This study highlights the low prevalence of helmet use and documents the potential reduction in the risk of head injuries if this risk factor was addressed.

Out of 150 cases only 36 cases (24%) used protective gears. (Helmet and Seatbelt). Use of Protective measure led to better visual outcome in comparison with those who had not use any protective measures.

The passage of a traffic amendment bill showed negligible impact on helmet use. This highlights the need for a multi-faceted strategy that includes media campaigns and widespread enforcement in addition to legislative change for improving helmet use. 14

Specific tests of optic nerve function such as contrast sensitivity, colour vision, optic nerve head morphology, field testing and visually evoked potential could not be carried out in the acute setting of this study; hence subtle optic neuropathy, especially in cases with normal or near normal Snellen acuity, could have been missed.15

Conclusion

From July 2020 to July 2022, 900 patients with head injuries presented at the trauma center, with 150 exhibiting ocular manifestations. The incidence of specific ocular conditions included periorbital ecchymosis (36.34%), subconjunctival hemorrhage (10.34%), traumatic optic neuropathy (11.37%), and others in varying frequencies. The use of protective gear, such as helmets and seatbelts, has significantly reduced road traffic accident casualties. Radiological investigations like CT and MRI scans are essential for identifying ocular conditions like optic nerve avulsion and globe rupture, which may be missed in clinical examinations. These imaging techniques facilitate rapid diagnosis and earlier management of ocular injuries.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflic of Interest

None.

References

1 

GPV Stavern V Biousse MJ Lynn DJ Simon NJ Newman Neuro-Ophthalmic manifestations of head traumaJ Neuroophthalmol20012121127

2 

A Emem E Uwemedimbuk Prevalence of traumatic ocular injuries in a teaching hospital south-south Nigeria: a 2-year studyAdv Trop Med Pub Health Int2012231028

3 

AR Kulkarni SP Aggarwal RR Kulkarni MD Deshpande PB Walimbe AS Labhsetwar Ocular manifestations of head injury: A clinical studyEye (Lond)200519125763

4 

R Sharma R Gupta R Anand R Ingle Ocular manifestations of head injury and incidence of post-traumatic ocular motor nerve involvement: A clinical reviewInt Ophthalmol2014344893900

5 

B Liu R Ivers R Norton S Blows SK Lo Helmets for preventing injury in motorcycle ridersCochrane Database Syst Rev20042CD004333

6 

BS Foster GA March MJ Lucareri N Samiy S Lessell Optic nerve avulsionArch Ophthalmol1997115562330

7 

RS Baker AD Epstein Ocular motor abnormalities from head traumaSurv Ophthalmol199135424567

8 

S Ono Y Hua R F Keep Ocular abnormalities after traumatic brain injuryNeurol Clin Pract201114329334

9 

TO Odebode DS Ademola-Popoola TA Ojo AA Ayanniyi Ocular and visual complications of head injuryEye (Lond)20051955616

10 

NS Raju Ocular manifestations in head injuriesIndian J Ophthalmol198331678992

11 

B Tarlan H Kiratli Subconjunctival hemorrhage: risk factors and potential indicatorsClin Ophthalmol20137116370

12 

FJ Rowe K Hanna JR Evans CP Noonan M Garcia‐Finana CS Dodridge Interventions for eye movement disorders due to acquired brain injuryCochrane Database Syst Rev201820183CD011290

13 

NS Falk EB Aksionoff The primary care optometric evaluation of the traumatic brain injury patientJ Am Optom Assoc199263854753

14 

AM Bachani YW Hung S Mogere D Akunga J Nyamari AA Hyder Helmet wearing in Kenya: prevalence, knowledge, attitude, practice and implicationsPublic Health20171442331

15 

OR Marmoy A Viswanathan Clinical electrophysiology of the optic nerve and retinal ganglion cellsEye (Lond)202135923862405



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Original Article


Article page

771-776


Authors Details

Rupal Twinkle Shah, Aarti Hitendra Dave*, Abhishek Twinkle Shah, Vaidehi Chandrakantbhai Shah, Dhruv Rajeshkumar Gajjar


Article History

Received : 23-04-2024

Accepted : 22-08-2024


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files