Introduction
Head injuries, affecting 200-300 individuals per 100,000 annually, often present with ocular manifestations, significantly contributing to global visual disability.1 Ocular trauma stands out as a leading cause of blindness, impacting over half a million individuals worldwide, with a notable prevalence in developing nations. The demographic most affected by these injuries are children and young adults, amplifying the socioeconomic implications associated with such incidents. Common ophthalmic findings in head injury cases include periorbital ecchymosis, subconjunctival hemorrhage, pupillary abnormalities, and retinal detachments, among others.2 Unfortunately, these ocular signs are sometimes overlooked initially, leading to delayed ophthalmic evaluation and potential complications. Early recognition and correlation of these findings are crucial for accurately localizing the injury site, ongoing assessment, and determining patient prognosis.3 The implementation of helmets and other protective measures within communities has shown a significant reduction in road traffic accidents, subsequently lowering the incidence of head injuries and the associated visual morbidity.4, 5 This preventive approach highlights the importance of injury prevention strategies in safeguarding individuals from the devastating consequences of head trauma on ocular health.
Materials and Methods
The study was conducted in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) and was approved by Local Ethics Committee of the institute. One hundred fifty patients presenting with head injuries associated with ocular manifestations were recruited at our trauma center, Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad. Written and informed consent was obtained from the patient or their relative. Visual acuity was assessed using methods such as counting fingers or, where possible, Snellen chart examination. The anterior segment was examined using a torchlight, with slit lamp examination conducted if feasible. Evaluation of the posterior segment was carried out using direct and indirect ophthalmoscopy or ultrasonography as required. Radiological imaging (CT scan/MRI) was utilized as needed and correlated with clinical findings. Detailed documentation of all findings was performed for both eyes. Follow-up assessments were conducted on day 3, day 7, and at 1 month post-injury to monitor patient progress.
Observation and Results
150 patients of Head Injury with ocular manifestations were included in our study after taking written and informed consent.
Table 1
|
Frequency |
Percent |
1-10 |
7 |
4.67 |
11-20 |
23 |
15.33 |
21-30 |
48 |
32.00 |
31-40 |
27 |
18.00 |
41-50 |
31 |
20.67 |
51-60 |
7 |
4.67 |
61-70 |
6 |
4.00 |
71-80 |
1 |
0.67 |
Total |
150 |
100.0 |
Age of patients ranged from 2 to 72 years with a mean of 32.79 years (+-14.55 years). Young Adult males (11-30 years) were the major group who sustained head injury. i.e., 71 of the 150 of head injury cases. (Table 1) The incidence of head injury was less during childhood, peaked in the third decades of life, and thereafter declined.
Out of 150 cases of head injury, 126 cases (84%) were Male and 24(16%) were Female.(Figure 1) The vulnerability of the young males is due to the increased association with outdoor activities.
Table 2
Mode of Injury |
Frequency |
Percent |
Assault |
15 |
13.39 |
Fall down |
18 |
16.07 |
RTA |
117 |
78.0 |
Total |
150 |
100.0 |
Road Traffic Accidents (RTA) was the most common cause of head injury in 117 cases (78%) followed by Fall down in 18 cases (16.07%). In remaining 15 patients cause of head injury is Assault (13.39%). (Table 2 and Figure 2)
Table 4
Use of protective measures |
||
|
Frequency |
Percent |
No |
114 |
75.33 |
Yes (Helmet) |
32 |
21.33 |
Yes (Seatbelt) |
4 |
2.67 |
Total |
150 |
100.0 |
This study highlights the low prevalence of helmet and seatbelt use and documents the potential reduction in the risk of head injuries if this risk factor was addressed. Out of 150 cases 36 cases (24%) used protective gears.(Table 4)
Table 5
Incidence of ocular manifestations in our study is periorbital Echymosis (36.34%), Sub-conjunctival hemorrhage (10.34%), Conjunctival chemosis (4.67%), Laceration of Upper eyelid (2%), Hyphema (1.34%), EOM restricted (1.34%), Laceration of lower eyelid (1%), Proptosis (1%), Traumatic iridodialysis (1%), Traumatic cataract (0.67%), Globe rupture (0.34%), Traumatic third nerve palsy (0.34%).
Table 6
Table 7
Table 8
Table 9
|
|
Visual Acuity |
Total |
|
|
|
>=6/60 |
<6/60 |
|
Use of Protective Measure |
Yes |
31 |
1 |
32 |
No |
94 |
24 |
118 |
|
Total |
|
125 |
25 |
150 |
Out of 150 patients of head injury only 32 patients had history of usage of protective gears and out of them 31 cases having good visual outcome (Table 9).
Discussion
Head injuries are defined as cases involving brain involvement evidenced by loss of consciousness, post-traumatic amnesia, neurological signs, or skull fractures. These injuries often affect the eyes, leading to neuro-ophthalmic deficits. While ophthalmologists typically focus on obvious ocular issues like contusions and lacerations, subtle manifestations can be equally crucial yet may be overlooked, especially in patients with reduced consciousness or concurrent injuries.6
This study examines ocular findings during the acute phase of head injury, including physical ocular trauma, orbital fractures, and neuro-ophthalmic issues. A comprehensive ocular assessment significantly contributes to understanding the injury's severity, prognosis, and ocular motor involvement, which are vital for effective rehabilitation.7
Pupillary signs play a critical role in indicating injury site and severity, as well as predicting prognosis. They help localize supratentorial injuries, hemorrhages, and pontine lesions, with Hutchison's pupillary signs signaling the need for urgent intervention.8 Early identification of these signs could logically reduce subsequent morbidity and mortality rates.
In our study age of patients ranged from 2 to 72 years with a mean of 32.79 years (+-14.55 years). Young Adult males (16-30 years) were the major group who sustained head injury. i.e., 71 of the 150 of head injury cases. The incidence of head injury was less during childhood, peaked in the third decades of life, and thereafter declined. Out of 150 cases of head injury, 126 cases (84%) were male and 24(16%) were female. These findings align with those of other studies. For instance, Kulkarni et al.3 demonstrated that young adult males aged 21–30 are particularly vulnerable, while Odebode et al. identified a peak occurrence during the third decade of life (21–30 years).9 Sharma et al. observed a peak vulnerability among individuals aged 21–40 years. This heightened risk among young people is attributed to their increased engagement in outdoor activities.4
Road Traffic Accidents (RTA) was the most common cause of head injury in 117 cases (78%) followed by Fall down in 18 cases (16.07%). In remaining 15 patients cause of head injury is Assault (13.39%) other studies also showed almost similar observations. Raju et al reported 47.5% of cases because of RTA and 32.5% of cases due to fall from height.10
Incidence of ocular manifestations in our study is Periorbital Echymosis (36.34%), Sub-conjunctival Hemorrhage (10.34%), Conjunctival Chemosis (4.67%), Laceration of Upper Eyelid (2%), Hyphema (1.34%), EOM restricted (1.34%), Laceration of Lower Eyelid (1%), Proptosis (1%), Traumatic Iridodialysis (1%), Traumatic Cataract(0.67%), Globe Rupture (0.34%), Traumatic Third Nerve Palsy (0.34%). Periorbital ecchymosis was 22%-27% in other studies. The incidence of subconjunctival haemorrhage was 10.58%. Pupillary abnormalities were found in 7.95% as in other studies.11
Rehabilitation of the head injury patient is much more difficult if the visual system is not efficient. Head injury patients may be difficult to examine because of cognitive and communication disorders. A complete assessment may include evaluation of the eye, refraction, and examination of ocular motility, accommodation, vergence, stereopsis, visual perception, and visual fields.12, 13
This study highlights the low prevalence of helmet use and documents the potential reduction in the risk of head injuries if this risk factor was addressed.
Out of 150 cases only 36 cases (24%) used protective gears. (Helmet and Seatbelt). Use of Protective measure led to better visual outcome in comparison with those who had not use any protective measures.
The passage of a traffic amendment bill showed negligible impact on helmet use. This highlights the need for a multi-faceted strategy that includes media campaigns and widespread enforcement in addition to legislative change for improving helmet use. 14
Specific tests of optic nerve function such as contrast sensitivity, colour vision, optic nerve head morphology, field testing and visually evoked potential could not be carried out in the acute setting of this study; hence subtle optic neuropathy, especially in cases with normal or near normal Snellen acuity, could have been missed.15
Conclusion
From July 2020 to July 2022, 900 patients with head injuries presented at the trauma center, with 150 exhibiting ocular manifestations. The incidence of specific ocular conditions included periorbital ecchymosis (36.34%), subconjunctival hemorrhage (10.34%), traumatic optic neuropathy (11.37%), and others in varying frequencies. The use of protective gear, such as helmets and seatbelts, has significantly reduced road traffic accident casualties. Radiological investigations like CT and MRI scans are essential for identifying ocular conditions like optic nerve avulsion and globe rupture, which may be missed in clinical examinations. These imaging techniques facilitate rapid diagnosis and earlier management of ocular injuries.