Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Print ISSN: 2395-1443

Online ISSN: 2395-1451

CODEN : IJCEKF

Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (IJCEO) is open access, a peer-reviewed medical journal, published quarterly, online, and in print, by the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF) since 2015. To fulfil our aim of rapid dissemination of knowledge, we publish articles ‘Ahead of Print’ on acceptance. In addition, the journal allows free access (Open Access) to its content, which is likely to attract more readers and citations of articles published in IJCEO. Manuscripts must be prepared in more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 341

PDF Downloaded: 411


Get Permission Afroze M, Sangeeta M, Bhaskar, Vishal, Raju V, and Vel P: Tomographical study of optic strut location and its significance


Introduction

The prechiasmatic sulcus (PCS) is a groove seen on the upper surface of the sphenoid bone that spans across both sides of the optic canal (OC). This sulcus is bounded by the limbus sphenoidale in front and the tuberculum sella at the back.1, 2 Additionally, there are bony projections known as optic struts (OS) that connect the base of the anterior clinoid process (ACP) to the sphenoid body. The optic strut is positioned between the OC and the superior orbital fissure.3 It was first described by Jefferson way back in 1936 during his study involving radiology of optic canal.4 Optic strut and Prechiasmatic sulcus are important anatomic landmarks for accessing ophthalmic artery aneurysms or tumors in the regions adjoining sella turcica.5, 6, 7 OS along with the ACP are separated from the lesser wing of sphenoid to provide better access to Internal Carotid artery and cavernous sinus in cases of aneurysms or tumors involving cavernous sinus.8, 9, 10, 11 There is a paucity of studies on the morphometry of optic strut in the Indian population. Owing to the increasing number of endoscopic approaches carried out in the region, this study was carried out with the following objectives -

  1. To determine the attachment of OS relative to the ACP, whether attachment limited to anterior 1/3, middle 1/3 or posterior 1/3 of anterior clinoid process.

  2. To classify the OS into sulcal, presulcal and postsulcal type based on the location of posteromedial margin of the OS relative to PCS.

  3. To determine if there is any association between gender and optic strut attachment pattern.

  4. To determine the association between laterality and optic strut attachment pattern.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study was carried out in the Department of Radiology of MVJMC&RH. 100 normal CT scans of Head and Para nasal sinus in the age group of 18 to 60 years were studied following approval by Institutional ethical committee. Abnormal CT scans showing beam hardening artifacts and calcifications involving internal carotid artery were excluded. Sample size was calculated based on previous studies with a precision of 5% and 95% confidence interval.1

The 3D reconstructed images were aligned to offer insights into the sellar and paraesellar region, specifically focusing on the connection of the OS to the body of the sphenoid. This attachment was categorized as presulcal if the uppermost inner edge of the optic strut was located in front of the limbus sphenoidale, sulcal if it was adjacent to the anterior two-thirds of the PCS, and postsulcal if it was positioned behind the anterior two-thirds of the PCS (Figure 1 A-C). The attachment of the optic strut was also examined in relation to the ACP and classified as anterior (attached to the anterior of ACP), middle (attached to the middle one-third of ACP), and posterior (attached to the posterior one-third of ACP). Data was analysed using SPSS software.

Figure 1

Schematic representation of types of OS in relation to sulcus terminalis. A) Presulcal type, B) Sulcal type C) Post sulcal type. ST: Sella turcica, ACP: Anterior clinoid process, OS: Optic struct

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/0945a533-c610-4db4-a8cb-60c191b7ddbcimage1.png

Results

100 3D constructed images of normal CT scans of head and neck were analyzed in the present study. It was observed that on the right side the attachment of OS to the ACP was most commonly observed in middle third of ACP (57%) followed by anterior third (28%) and least incidence in posterior one third (15%). The same pattern was also observed on the left side (Table 1).

Table 1

Attachment of OS in relation to ACP

OS location relative to ACP

Right side

Total

P value

Left side

Total

P value

Female

Male

Female

Male

Anterior 1/3 rd

7

21

28

0.009

6

20

26

0.024

17.1%

35.6%

28.0%

14.6%

33.9%

26.0%

Middle 1/3 rd

23

34

57

24

33

57

56.1%

57.6%

57.0%

58.5%

55.9%

57.0%

Posterior 1/3 rd

11

4

15

11

6

17

26.8%

6.8%

15.0%

26.8%

10.2%

17.0%

Total

41

59

100

41

59

100

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

Based on the positioning of OS in relation to the PCS, specimens were classified into presulcal, sulcal and postsulcal. Sulcal optic strut was the commonest variant observed (50%) followed by presulcal variant (31%) postsulcal variant was the least common variant observed (16%). The above incidence was observed bilaterally. 3% cases showed the presence of unilateral presulcal variant on the left side whereas on the right side postsulcal variant and sulcal variant were observed in 1 case and 2 cases respectively.

Table 2

Classification of optic strut in relation to sulcus terminalis

Laterality

Types

Frequency

Percent

Bilateral

Nil

3

3.0

Postsulcal

16

16.0

Presulcal

31

31.0

Sulcal

50

50.0

Unilateral – Left Side

Nil

97

97.0

Presulcal

3

3.0

Unilateral - Right Side

Nil

97

97.0

Postsulcal

1

1.0

Sulcal

2

2.0

Figure 2

Showing A) Presulcal type B) Sulcal type C) Postsulcal type. ST: Sella turcica, ACP: Anterior clinoid process, Asterisks*: Optic struct

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/0945a533-c610-4db4-a8cb-60c191b7ddbcimage2.png

There was a significant gender difference in the type of optic strut observed in male and female it was observed that asymmetric optic strut was observed in 3% cases of which 2 were males and 1 was female. Symmetric optic strut was observed in 97% with sulcal variety as the commonest in both males and females accounting for 50%. Incidence of postsulcal variety was more in females (24.4%) compared to males (10.2%). Presulcal variant was observed predominantly in males (40.7%).

Table 3

Association between gender and type of optic strut

Types

Gender

Total

P value

Female

Male

NIL

1

2

3

0.046 (SIG)

2.4%

3.4%

3.0%

Postsulcal

10

6

16

24.4%

10.2%

16.0%

Presulcal

7

24

31

17.1%

40.7%

31.0%

Sulcal

23

27

50

56.1%

45.8%

50.0%

Total

41

59

100

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

Discussion

Kerr et al. classified Optic strut based on its location relative to PCS into presulcal, sulcal and postsulcal variants. In the present study, Optic strut was studied based on above Classification. Kerr et al. stated that sulcal variant was the commonest observed followed by postsulcal and presulcal in Greek population. They also reported that sulcal variant was commonly observed in Indians and Americans.7 In our study postsulcal variant was least common variant observed and sulcal variant was the most common variant observed similar to the above study.

The majority of optic struts were observed to be attached to the anterior 2/5 of the anterior clinoid process (ACP) in both Korean and Indian populations, as reported in studies by Kanellopoulou et al.5 A study by Kapur and Mehic analysed on 200 dry human skulls of both sexes including 109 males and 91 females yielded similar findings, with 42% on the right side and 47.8% on the left side showing this attachment pattern.12 Menasinkai and Savitha conducted another research study on 37 dry skulls, and their results were consistent (45.95% on the right side and 37.83% on the left side) with those of Kanellopoulou et al. and Kapur and Mehic.13 Results of present study are in concordance with the above findings, most of the OS were attached to middle third of the anterior clinoid process followed by anterior third. But it was contradicting to Gupta & Priya findings,14 who reported OS were more commonly attached to the anterior 1/3 of the ACP on both sides.

Gonzalez and colleagues suggested that the positioning of an internal carotid artery aneurysm in relation to the OS serves as a dependable indicator to determine whether the aneurysm is situated within the subarachnoid space or in the extradural clinoid segment. The location of the optic strut could also play a significant role in selecting the appropriate surgical approach.13 For example, in cases of optic nerve decompression resulting from trauma, the position of the optic strut would influence the choice of the surgical procedure, whether it's an endoscopic transnasal approach, a minimally invasive supraorbital approach, or a peritoneal approach.11, 15, 16

Kanellopoulou V et al5 classified prechiasmatic sulci using Guthikonda13 classification based on its dimensions i.e interoptic distance sulcal length and sulcal angle in Greek population. They classified prechiasmatic sulcus into narrow sulcus (less than 0.7 cm) and wide sulcus (greater than 0.7 cm) based on the sulcal length (mean sulcal length 0.7 cm). Based on the sulcal angle the prechiasmatic sulci were classified as flat (sulcal angle less than 24 degree) and steep (sulcal angle greater than 24 degree). They observed that mean interoptic distance was less in females compared to males whereas sulcal length was slightly greater in females than males. The mean sulcal angle was less in females than males.

They classified skulls into four types. Type 1 with narrow steep sulcus, Type 2 with narrow flat sulcus, Type 3 with wide steep sulcus and type 4 with wide flat sulcus. Type 1 was the most common variant observed followed by Type 4 and Type 2. Type 3 was the least common variant observed.

Any surgeries involving cavernous sinus mandate the excision of both optic strut and anterior clinoid process failing which there might internal carotid artery or optic nerve are liable to get injured. Excision of the strut should be from anteromedial to posterolateral. During excision one must ensure to remove the optic strut prior to anterior clinoid process enabling itself to release completely.12

Conclusion

There are not many reliable anatomic markers to discriminate intradural and extradural aneurysms in the parasellar region. Opthalmic artery, anterior clinoid process and optic strut have been considered in the previous literature as landmarks for discriminating aneurysms. Of all the anatomical landmarks mentioned, the optic strut emerges as the most dependable, primarily owing to its relatively small size. This compact size affords radiologists the capability to accurately pinpoint the exact position of the dural ring, a critical reference point that plays a pivotal role in the planning of suitable treatment modalities.

Author Contributions

Initials of the contributing authors are listed in brackets at the relevant parts of the research: Study concept & design (K.H.A.M.), Literature search (S.M), Data collection (ARAV, TRV, SVP, SB) Statistical data analysis, Data interpretation and drafting the manuscript (K.H.A.M., S.M). All the authors approved the final version of the article.

Source of Funding

The authors have no relevant financial information to disclose.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

1 

TL Stedman Stedman’s medical dictionary for the health professions and nursing7th edWolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & WilkinsPhiladelphia2012

2 

K Suprasanna SR Ravikiran A Kumar C Chavadi S Pulastya Optic Strut and Para-clinoid Region - Assessment by Multi-detector Computed Tomography with Multiplanar and 3 Dimensional ReconstructionsJ Clin Diagn Res201591069

3 

K Hashimoto K Nozaki N Hashimoto Optic strut as a radiographic landmark in evaluating neck location of a paraclinoid aneurysmNeurosurgery200659488095

4 

G Jefferson Radiography of the optic canalsProc R Soc Med193629116972

5 

V Kanellopoulou E Efthymiou V Thanopoulou D Kozompoli D Mytilinaios M Piagkou Prechiasmatic sulcus and optic strut: an anatomic study in dry skullsActa Neurochir (Wien)2017159466576

6 

B Guthikonda WD Tobler SC Froelich JL Leach L A Zimmer PV Theodosopoulos Anatomic study of the prechiasmatic sulcus and its surgical implicationsClin Anat20102366228

7 

RG Kerr WD Tobler JL Leach PV Theodosopoulos H Kocaeli LA Zimmer Anatomic variation of the optic strut: classification schema, radiologic evaluation, and surgical relevanceJ Neurol Surg B Skull Base20127364249

8 

DN Pai D Chaitra Morphometric Study of Anterior Clinoid Process and Its Clinical Importance In Skulls Of South Indian PopulationJ Pharm Negat Res202213519303

9 

HY Lee IH Chung BY Choi KS Lee Anterior clinoid process and optic strut in KoreansYonsei Med J19973831514

10 

V Dolenc Direct microsurgical repair of intracavernous vascular lesionsJ Neurosurg198358682431

11 

Y Yonekawa N Ogata HG Imhof M Olivecrona K Strommer TE Kwak Selective extradural anterior clinoidectomy for supra-and parasellar processesJ Neurosurg199787463642

12 

E Kapur A Mehić Anatomical variations and morphometric study of the optic strut and the anterior clinoid processBosn J Basic Med Sci20121228893

13 

SB Menasinkai V Savitha Morphometric Analysis of Anterior Clinoid Process and Optic Strut: A Cadaveric StudyInt J Anat2022114114

14 

N Gupta A Priya Anterior Clinoid Process And Optic Strut--A Morphometric StudyJ Evol Med Dent Sci2018732357781

15 

LF Gonzalez MT Walker JM Zabramski S Partovi RC Wallace RF Spetzler Distinction between paraclinoid and cavernous sinus aneurysms with computed tomographic angiographyNeurosurgery200352511317

16 

T Inoue AL Rhoton D Theele ME Barry Surgical approaches to the cavernous sinus: a microsurgical studyNeurosurgery199026690332



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Original Article


Article page

110-114


Authors Details

Khizer Hussain Afroze M*, Sangeeta M, Shreyas Bhaskar, A Ra Vishal, Tulsi Raju V, Shakthi Vel P


Article History

Received : 13-10-2023

Accepted : 09-12-2023


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files