Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Print ISSN: 2395-1443

Online ISSN: 2395-1451

CODEN : IJCEKF

Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (IJCEO) is open access, a peer-reviewed medical journal, published quarterly, online, and in print, by the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF) since 2015. To fulfil our aim of rapid dissemination of knowledge, we publish articles ‘Ahead of Print’ on acceptance. In addition, the journal allows free access (Open Access) to its content, which is likely to attract more readers and citations of articles published in IJCEO. Manuscripts must be prepared in more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 955

PDF Downloaded: 259


Get Permission Maurya, Singh, Gautam, Asha, Kumar, Mishra, Jain, Singh, Singh, Ul Kadir, Pakdel, Shukla, and Patel: Study of epidemiology, clinical profile, visual outcome and prognostic factors of blunt ocular trauma in a teaching hospital


Introduction

Ocular trauma is a leading cause of avoidable monocular blindness and visual impairment worldwide.1 The incidence and prevalence of ocular trauma vary based on geographical location, climate and societal factors. Approximately 1.6 million people worldwide are blind due to ocular trauma, 2.3 million being bilaterally visually impaired and 19 million have unilateral loss of vision.2, 3 The reported incidence of ocular trauma in India varies from 1% to 5%.4, 5 5% of all ophthalmic hospitalisation in the developed countries are due to ocular trauma and this figure is much higher in developing countries.6 Despite its public health importance, ocular trauma is most neglected and under-reported disorder.

Severity and extent of ocular injury is determined by the amount of energy transferred to the globe & orbit, characteristic of traumatic agent and location of impact area. Blunt trauma is the commonest form (54.9%) of ocular injury.7 Blunt trauma can occur in almost any setting and circumstances including workplace / domestic accidents, road traffic accidents, sports & recreational activities and physical assaults etc.8

The most common traumatic agent causing blunt ocular trauma are cricket ball, squash ball, fist, bamboo /wooden stick, airbag, cow horn and other projectile objects like stone, brick & Gulli etc.9, 10 The spectrum of blunt ocular injuries ranges from mild non-sight threatening injuries like ecchymosis of eye lid, corneal abrasion, sub-conjunctival haemorrhage to extremely serious blinding consequences such as globe rupture, retinal detachment, intraocular haemorrhage, traumatic optic neuropathy and orbital haemorrhage etc.

Blunt ocular trauma can cause damage of ocular tissue by the coup and countercoup mechanism and anteroposterior compression or horizontal tissue expansion. Coup injury occur at the site of impact (e.g. ecchymosis of lid, sub-conjunctival haemorrhage and corneal abrasion etc). Counter-coup refers to injuries at the opposite side of site of impact like commotio retinae.11

Blunt trauma causes various effects in anterior and posterior segment of the eyeball and its adnexa [eyelid, orbit, conjunctiva]. In this hospital based, observational study we analyze the demographic profile, injury pattern, clinical presentation, visual outcome and prognostic factors of blunt ocular trauma.

Materials and Methods

This was a prospective, hospital based, observational study conducted at the outpatient Department of Ophthalmology and Emergency Services, Sir Sunderlal Hospital, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. The present study was conducted over a period of four years from March 2012 to February 2016. Out of 402 patients having ocular trauma 226 patients with a definite history of recent blunt trauma to the eyeball and ocular adnexa who were visiting for the first time and willing to give consent were included in the study. Patient with the history of penetrating ocular injury, non-mechanical ocular trauma, old ocular injuries (>1 month), patients operated elsewhere, having pre-existing vision threatening ocular co-morbidity, injury in phthisical eye and patients who were not willing to give consent were excluded from the study.

After getting ethical clearance from research Ethical Committee of Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh and informed, written consent all study subjects underwent detailed history and ocular & systemic examination. A detailed history regarding demographic information such as age, sex, residential area, marital status, occupation and educational status of the patient and specific history of trauma including date, time, place, and mode of injury, circumstances of injury, characteristics of traumatic agent and condition of the victim at the time of injury and information about protective measures taken at the time of injury were recorded.

All patients underwent detailed ocular examination including initial visual acuity assessment, anterior segment evaluation with diffuse torch light and slit lamp examination, gonioscopy (if possible), intraocular pressure measurement (only in closed globe injury) and posterior segment examination with direct ophthalmoscopy and or indirect ophthalmoscopy to assess type, extent and severity of injury and structural and functional loss was noted. Investigation like OCT, X-ray orbit, ultrasonography (USG B Scan), CT scan and MRI were done as per indication.

All patients were managed according to the injury and close follow up was done to assess the treatment outcome / complications. All the information was collected in a predesigned and pretested performa.

Results

Blunt injury is the most frequently observed mode of ocular trauma, in our study, out of 402 patients having ocular trauma, 226 had definite history of recent blunt trauma to the eye. Thus, in our study the extent of blunt mode of ocular trauma was 56.2%.

Demographic profile

Socio-demographic profile of the study subjects is given in Table 1. Out of 226 patients of blunt ocular trauma 181 (80.1%) were males and 45 (19.9%) were females with a male female ratio of 4:1. The mean age was 42.6 ± 18.8 years. The youngest patient was 2 years old and the oldest was of 70 years. Majority of the patients belonged to the 16-25 years (55 patients, 24.3%) and 26-35 years (54 patients, 23.9%) age group. As for the religion, was concerned 80.1% subjects were Hindu and 17.7% were Muslim. Blunt trauma was highest (68.6%) in subjects living in rural areas, whereas the proportion of subjects belonging to Urban and Semi-urban area were 12.8% and 18.6% respectively. Among the injured patients, 25.7% were students, whereas 21.2%, 16.8%, 12.4% and 11.5% were farmer, in service, housewife and laborers, respectively.

Injury profile

Table 2 shows the injury profile of the study subjects. It was observed that commonest place of injury was street or road (30.5%) followed by home (27.9%), work place (17.7%), playground or place of recreation (13.3%) and school (9.3%). Maximum injury occurred during summer season (39. 3%). Most common type of injury was non- occupational type in 184 (81·4%) cases, however in 42 (18.6%) cases blunt ocular trauma was related to patient’s occupation.

Common occupational injuries were related to agriculture work (8.8%) followed by building work (4.4%) and engineering work (3.1%). Among the non-occupational injury cases, most common was road traffic accident (RTA) related (26.5%) followed by recreational or sports related (22.6%) and assault related (21.7%). However, in 23 (10.2%) cases injury occurred due to fall or domestic accidents.

Vegetative material and wooden objects (like lathi, gulli-danda, bat, hockey & table/ door etc.) were the most frequent traumatic agents, seen in 59 (26.1%) cases. Other causative agents of blunt trauma were stone / brick (25.2%), metallic objects like iron rod, handle etc. (23.1%), ball (9.7%) fist / hand (4.9%) and animal horn (4.4%). However, in 15 (6.6%) cases agent of blunt trauma was not defined. Collision or impact of objects and projectile object was the commonest mode of blunt ocular trauma in 39.3% and 30.1% study subjects.

Pattern of ocular injury

Table 3 shows the pattern of ocular injury. About 32.3% of patient had isolated ocular injury while rest 67.7% were polytrauma patients. 23.5% of patients had head injury along with ocular trauma, 15.0% cases had oculofacial injuries while 16.4% patients had eye, head and maxillofacial trauma . 211 (93.4%) victims had unilateral ocular involvement and only 15 (6.6%) patients had bilateral injury. Maximum (53.1%) patients had left eye involvement.

Out of 241 injured eyes, 34 (14.0%) had only globe injury and in 59 (24.5%) eyes only ocular adnexae (lid & orbit) was involved. However simultaneous globe and adnexae were injured in 148 (61.4%) eyes. 19.9% eyes had open globe injury while 55.6% had closed globe injury (Table 4).

Clinical presentation

Most common conjunctival finding was congestion & chemosis (73.9% eyes) and sub-conjunctival hemorrhage (47.3% eyes). Among the periocular and lid injuries, 108 (44.8%) eyes had contusion/ ecchymosis (Figure 1), 40 (16.6%) had abrasion and 59 (24.5%) eyes had laceration (Figure 1). Commonest orbital trauma was bony fracture (63.9% eyes) and orbital hemorrhage & emphysema (23.2% eyes). Orbital walls were spared in 87 (36.1%) eyes. Most common orbital wall fracture was floor fracture (26.1%) followed by medial wall fracture (21.6%). Roof of orbit was involved in 15.8% eyes (Figure 3). (Table 5)

Figure 1

A): Young boy having blunt trauma due to fall from height showing both eye both eyelid ecchymosis; B: Clinical photograph of a young girl having blunt trauma of right eye with projectile object showing ecchymosis & edema of both eyelid of right eye

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c526afe5-7422-42d5-868e-f697b208ac8b/image/5489255f-e718-496d-b9b7-28c48995ec37-uimage.png

Figure 2

A): Clinical photograph of adult male having assault related blunt trauma right eye showing abrasion of right lower eyelid and temporal sub-conjunctival hemorrhage; B: Clinical photograph of a adult male having RTA related blunt trauma showing abrasion and laceration of right lower eyelid involving lower canaliculi

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c526afe5-7422-42d5-868e-f697b208ac8b/image/5ae725cd-1f3e-4535-8bbf-5f226955c328-uimage.png

Out of 241 injured eyes 182 (75.5%) had globe injury. 50 (20.7%) eyes had purely posterior segment injuries, 76 eyes (31.5%) had purely anterior segment injuries and 56 (23.2%) eyes had both anterior & posterior segment injuries. Most common anterior segment finding was corneal abrasion (45.6% eyes) followed by hyphema (44.0%), traumatic mydriasis (35.7%), lens dislocation (22.8%) (Figure 4), corneo-scleral rupture (19.9%), traumatic cataract (17.4%), iridodialysis (16.6%) and lens subluxation (13.7% eyes) (Table 6).

Posterior segment damage was seen in 106 (44.0%) eyes. Commonest posterior segment finding was vitreous hemorrhage (33.2% eyes) followed by retinal detachment (20.3% eyes), retinal hemorrhage (15.8% eyes) retinal tear / hole (11.6% eyes) and traumatic optic neuropathy (2.9% eyes). Post traumatic endophthalmitis was observed in 13 (5.4%) eyes. (Table 6)

Figure 3

A: Young male having blunt trauma of right orbit with cricket bat showing ecchymosis both eyelid, periocular swelling & lower lid laceration; B: 3 D-reformated CT Scan image showing multiple displaced fracture of maxillary & zygomatic bone involving right floor & lateral wall of orbit

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c526afe5-7422-42d5-868e-f697b208ac8b/image/12d1d635-fd14-47bb-aade-b18d7a4810f1-uimage.png

Figure 4

A: Blunt ocular trauma causing scleral rupture with total hyphema; B: Cow horn injury causing Phacocele with Hyphaema

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c526afe5-7422-42d5-868e-f697b208ac8b/image/f04a4d8b-705f-4341-b31d-2d5223659090-uimage.png

At the time of initial presentation vision was good (VA > 6/12) in 80 (33.2%) eyes, visual impairment (VA 6/18- 6/60) was observed in 69 (28.6%) eyes and blindness (< 6/60 - NOPL) in 86 (35.7%) eyes while visual acuity could not be assessed in 6 (2.5%) eyes (Table 7).

As extent of globe injury was concerned, Zone-III injuries were more common in eyes with closed globe injury (35, 14.5% eyes) as compared to open globe injury (12, 5.0% eyes) (Figure 5) while Zone-II injuries were almost equal in eyes with open globe injury (19, 7.9%) to that of closed globe injuries (18, 7.5%) (Table 8, Table 9). 46 injured right eyes had ≤ 3 ocular structure involvement and 36 eyes had ≥ 4 structure involved while 72 injured left eyes had ≥ 4 ocular structure involvement.

Treatment outcome and visual prognosis

Maximum (n=115, 50.9%) patients were managed by conservative / medical treatment, 46 (20.4%) underwent for only ocular surgery (Figure 5), however 65 (28.8%) patients required multidisciplinary treatment. Table 10 represents final visual outcome. After 6 months, vision was good in 138 eyes (57.3%), impaired vision in 48 (19.9%) eyes and blindness in 51 eyes (21.2%). However, Final visual outcome could not be assessed in 4 (1.7%) eyes due to lack of final follow-up. Table 11 showed important prognostic factor (ocular trauma score) in injured eyes. Ocular trauma score was in category I (<45) in 36 (14.9%) eyes (RE=6, LE=30). OTS was in category II (45-65) in 4.1% of right eye and 2.9% of left injured eye. OTS was in category III (66-80) in 24 (9.9%) eyes and in category V (92-100) in 70 (29.0%) eyes. However, OTS could not be determined in 20 (8.3%) eyes. Most of the eyes with globe rupture had lower level (category I & II). Lower OTS level tends to indicate poor prognosis.

Figure 5

A: Assault related Blunt trauma causing scleral rupture (Zone-III) with corneal edema & hyphema; B: Repaired scleral rupture

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c526afe5-7422-42d5-868e-f697b208ac8b/image/ab36a5de-1534-4cbd-b20c-98bc8bd30fe2-uimage.png

Visual impairment and blinding outcome were more common in left injured eyes. Visual outcome was poor in eyes having zone-III open globe injury/ posterior segment involvement including vitreous hemorrhage & retinal detachment etc. Six months after the treatment, 176 (77.8%) of victims had improvement, 14 (6.2%) were unchanged and 30 (13.3%) were deteriorated while 4 (1.8%.) were absent from last follow-up. Outcome was poor in eyes having ≥ 3 ocular structure involvement.

Table 1

Demographic profile of study subjects

Demographic Characteristics

Number (N=226)

Percentage

Age (Years)

0 – 5

11

4.9

6-15

38

16.8

16-25

55

24.3

26-35

54

23.9

36-45

34

15.0

46-55

18

8.0

56-65

10

4.4

>65

6

2.7

Sex

Male

181

80.1

Female

45

19.9

Residence

Urban

29

12.8

Semi-urban

42

18.6

Rural

155

68.6

Religion

Hindu

181

80.1

Muslim

40

17.7

Others

5

2.2

Occupation

Former

48

21.2

Laborer

26

11.5

Factory Worker

18

8.0

House Wife

28

12.4

Student

58

25.7

Service

38

16.8

Others

10

4.4

Table 2

Injury profile of the study subjects

Characteristics

Number (N=226)

Percentage

Place of Injury

Home

63

27.9

School

21

9.3

Playground

30

13.3

Street / Road

69

30.5

Work Place

40

17.7

Miscellaneous

3

1.3

Circumstances of Injury

Occupational (42, 18.6%)

Agriculture

20

8.8

Engineering

7

3.1

Carpentry

3

1.3

Building work

10

4.4

Others

2

0.9

Non-occupational (184, 81.4)

RTA

60

26.5

Assault

49

21.7

Sports related

51

22.6

Fall / Domestic Accidents

23

10.2

Others

1

0.4

Mode of Injury

Projectile Object

68

30.1

Fall

56

24.8

Collison / Impact

89

39.3

Blast Injury

2

0.9

Animal attack

6

2.7

Miscellaneous

5

2.2

Muslim

40

17.7

Traumatic Agents

Wooden objects

59

26.1

Stone / Brick

57

25.2

Metallic Objects

52

23.1

Ball

22

9.7

Fist / Hand

11

4.9

Animal Horn / Hood

10

4.4

Others

15

6.6

Table 3

Pattern of injury

Characteristics

Number (N=226)

Percentage

Laterality

Right Eye

91

40.3

Left Eye

120

53.1

Bilateral

15

6.6

Number of Body Organ involved

Isolated Eye Injury

73

32.3

Polytrauma (153, 67.7%)

Eye & Face

34

15.0

Eye & Head

53

23.5

Eye, Head & Face

37

16.4

Eye, Head & Limb

21

9.3

Eye, Head & Abdomen

8

3.5

Table 4

Distribution of eyes according to ocular structure involved

Structure Injured

Number of Eyes (N=241)

Percentage

Only Adnexal Injury

59 (RE 26, LE 33)

24.5

Only Open Globe Injury

15 (RE 3, LE 12)

6.2

Only Closed Globe Injury

19 (RE 11, LE 27)

7.9

Adnexal + Open Globe Injury

33 (RE 6, LE 27)

13.7

Adnexal + Closed Globe Injury

115 (RE 60, LE 55)

47.7

Table 5

Distribution of eyes according to adnexal injury

Structure Injured

Number of Eyes (N=241)

Percentage

Eyelid Injury

Contusion / ecchymosis

108

44.8

Abrasion / edema

40

16.6

Laceration

59

24.5

Orbital Trauma

Emphysema/ Hemorrhage

56

23.2

Orbital Fracture 154(63.9%)

Floor

63

26.1

Medial Wall

52

21.6

Lateral Wall

43

17.8

Roof

38

15.8

Conjunctival Injury

Congestion / Chemosis

178

73.9

Sub-conjunctival hemorrhage

114

47.3

Laceration

4

1.7

[i] (Many eyes had multiple adnexal injuries)

Table 6

Distribution of eye according to ocular findings

Changes in Eyeball

Number of Eyes (N=241)

Percentage

Anterior Segment Changes

Cornea & Sclera

Corneal Abrasion

110

45.6

Lamellar Laceration

21

8.7

Corneo-scleral Rupture

48

19.9

Anterior Chamber

Hyphema

106

44.0

A.C Reaction

23

9.5

Lens Matter

26

10.8

Iris & Pupil

Traumatic Mydriasis

86

35.7

Iridodialysis

40

16.6

Uveal prolapse

46

19.1

Lens

Vossius Ring

19

7.9

Traumatic Cataract

42

17.4

Lens Subluxation

33

13.7

Lens Dislocation

55

22.8

Posterior Segment Changes

Vitreous

Vitreous Hemorrhage

80

33.2

Endophthalmitis

13

5.4

Retina

Retinal/Macular Edema

26

10.8

Retinal tear / Macular hole

28

11.6

Retinal Hemorrhage

38

15.8

Retinal Detachment

49

20.3

Optic Nerve

7

2.9

Table 7

Initial grade of visual acuity (N=241 Eyes)

Grade of Visual Acuity

Right Eye No (%)

Left Eye No (%)

Total No (%)

Good Vision (> 6/12)

37 (15.4%)

43 (17.8%)

80 (33.2%)

Visual Impairment (6/18-6/60)

27 (11.2%)

42 (17.4%)

69 (28.6%)

Blindness (< 6/60-No PL)

38 (15.8%)

48 (17.4%)

86 (35.7%)

Could not be assessed

4 (1.7%)

2 (0.8%)

6 (2.5%)

Table 8

Distribution of injured eyes according to zone of closed globe injury

Zone of Injury

Right Eye No (%)

Left Eye No (%)

Total No (%)

Zone I

38(15.8%)

43 (17.8%)

81(33.6%)

Zone II

12 (4.9%)

6(2.5%)

18(7.5%)

Zone III

21 (8.7%)

14 (5.8%)

35 (14.5%)

N/A

9(3.7%)

39 (16.2%)

48 (19.9%)

Total

80 (33.1%)

102 (42.3%)

182 (75.5%)

Table 9

Distribution of injured eyes according to zone of open globe injury

Zone of Injury

Right Eye No (%)

Left Eye No (%)

Total No (%)

Zone I

5 (2.1%)

12 (5.0%)

17 (7.1%)

Zone II

2 (0.8%)

17 (7.1%)

19 (7.9%)

Zone III

2 (0.8%)

10 (4.1%)

12 (5.0%)

N/A

71 (3.7%)

63 (26.1%)

134 (55.6%)

Total

80 (33.1%)

102 (42.3%)

182 (75.5%)

Table 10

Final visual outcome after 6 months (N=241 Eyes)

Grade of Visual Acuity

Right Eye No (%)

Left Eye No (%)

Total No (%)

Good Vision (> 6/12)

60 (24.9%)

78 (32.4%)

138 (33.2%)

Visual Impairment (6/18-6/60)

26 (10.8%)

22 (9.1%)

48 (19.9%)

Blindness (< 6/60-NPL)

16 (6.6%)

35 (14.5%)

51 (21.2%)

Could not be assessed

4 (1.7%)

--

4 (1.7%)

Table 11

Distribution of injured eyes according to ocular trauma score

Ocular Trauma Score

Right Eye No (%)

Left Eye No (%)

Total No (%)

Category I (< 45)

6 (2.4%)

30 (12.4%)

36 (14.9%)

Category II (45-65)

10 (4.1%)

7 (2.9%)

17 (7.1%)

Category III (66-80)

10 (4.1%)

5 (2.1%)

15 (6.2%)

Category IV (81-91)

14 (5.8%)

10 (4.1%)

24 (9.9%)

Category V (92-100)

30 (12.4%)

40 (16.6%)

70 (29.0%)

Could not be assessed

10 (4.1%)

10 (4.1%)

20 (8.3%)

Discussion

Blunt objects are most common source of mechanical ocular trauma. In our series of 402 ocular injury cases 56.2% had blunt trauma. We analyzed 226 patients with 241 eye injuries caused by blunt traumatic agents. Our study concurs with MacEwen et al. (65%),12 Adamu et al. (77.8%),13 Titiyal GS et al. (32.7%)14 and Mark YZ Wong (32.6%)15 who reported higher Incidence of blunt ocular trauma. In contrast to this study Okoye OI (61%),16 Kaur et al. (73.7%),17 and Krishnan et al (69.2%)18 reported more of penetrating ocular injuries caused by sharp object.

In this study about 50% blunt ocular injuries occurred in the most productive age group (16-45 years of age). Males (80.1%) more commonly sustained blunt ocular trauma as compared to females (19.9%). This was consistent with the study done by Nayagam G et al.,19 Saxena R. et al.,20 Titiyal GS et al.14 and Oluyemi F et al.21 This male predominance seems to be due to outdoor activity, nature of occupational exposure, participation in dangerous recreational activities & sports, risk-taking behaviors, alcohol use and increase interpersonal conflicts.

Present study showed higher prevalence of blunt ocular trauma in rural population (68.6%) as compared to urban one (12.8%) in contrast to findings of Sujatha, MA et al who reported 78.% of blunt trauma in urban population.22 Dandana et al and Nirmalan et al also. reported higher prevalence in rural population.23, 24

In the current study, commonest place of injury was street / road (30.5%) followed by home (27.9%), work place (17.7%) and playground (13.3%). While in previous studies work place was found to be the commonest place of trauma.1, 25, 26 We observed that female subjects, were more likely injured at home while men were likely suffered by road traffic accidents and at work place trauma which is the similar to the results found in the study by Oum et al, Maurya R P et al. and Syal E. et al.27, 28, 25

In this study most common cause of blunt ocular trauma was RTA (26.5%) followed, by sports or recreational activities (22.6%) and physical assaults (21.7%). Previous studies also reported RTA as a commonest cause of blunt ocular trauma.29, 30, 31

In our study, commonest source of ocular trauma was wooden object (26.1%) like lathi, branch of tree, hockey, cricket bat etc. followed by stone / brick (25.2%) and metallic objects (23.1%) like metal rod, nail, handle etc. Rest sources of blunt trauma were ball (9.7%), hand & fist (4.9%) and animal horn (4.4%). Syal E et al was found most common traumatic agent as metallic objects (28.5%) followed by vegetative materials (11.0%).25 Pearlman et al. reported blunt ocular trauma caused by airbags.9

Majority (93.4%) of victims had unilateral blunt ocular trauma with predominance of left eye involvement (53%). However only 6.6% victims had bilateral involvement. Previously we reported overall bilaterally 8.5%.3, 32 Low bilaterality was reported in several studies e.g. Bucan et al (1%),33 MacEwen (2%),12 Babar et al (2.9%)34 and Jahagir et al (3%).6 We observed maximum bilaterally and left eye involvement in victim’s having RTA and assault related ocular trauma. About 32.3% of patient had isolated ocular trauma and rest 67.7% had associated polytrauma. Most common associated polytrauma was head injury (52.7%) and maxillo-facial trauma (31.4%). Ababneh et al (75%)35 was also reported head and neck trauma as most frequent associated body injuries with ocular trauma.

In the present study the most common ocular part involved was ocular adnexa in 85.9% eyes followed by globe injury in 75.5% eyes. 24.5% injured eyes had only adnexal injury. However 61.4% eyes had simultaneous globe and adnexal injuries Syal E et al. reported combined injury of adnexa and globe in 15% cases.25

In current study commonest adnexal injury was contusion / ecchymosis of eyelid (44.8%) followed by eyelid edema (71.4%), orbital fractures (63.9%) and sub-conjunctival hemorrhage (47.3%). Syal E et.al reported 46% contusional injury.25 Pai SG et al. reported lid edema / ecchymosis in 62.5% patients and 37.5% patients had sub-conjunctival hemorrhage.29 Comparable percentage reported by Ababneh et al (eyelid hematoma in 52.7% and SCH in 33.9% patients)35 and Soni et al (eyelid hematoma in 46.0% and SCH in 23.0% patients).36

We noticed that 56.6% eyes had closed globe injury and rest 19.9% eyes had globe rupture. Mishra A et al reported rupture globe in 13.6% of all ocular injuries.37 Mishra However closed globe injuries were found to be more common in several studies eg Marudhamuthu et al (95.3%),38 Syal E et al (60.5%)25 and Oum et al.27

In present study 182 eyes had globe injury. 76 eyes had purely anterior segment injury and 50 eyes had purely posterior segment injury while 56 eyes had both anterior and posterior segment injuries. Syal E et al found isolated posterior segment injury in 10% patients.25

In our study commonest type of anterior segment finding observed were corneal abrasion (45.6%), hyphema (44.0% eyes) and traumatic mydriasis (35% eyes). Traumatic cataract was most common type lens injury seen in 17.4% eyes. Liggett PE et al found that hyphema was present in 50% of the patients having blunt ocular trauma.39, 40

The most recorded posterior segment finding in our study was vitreous hemorrhage (33.2%) followed by retinal detachment (20.3%). Upon initial presentation 86 (35.7%) eyes were blind. 69 (28.6%) eyes had visual impairment. On final follow-up the number of visually impaired eyes had fallen to 48 (19.9%) and blind eye to 51 (21.2%).

In this study ruptured globe have worse prognosis than closed globe injury. Similar findings were reported by other researchers.41 Our finding suggests that poor visual outcome depends on initial visual acuity, extent of injury, presence of intraocular hemorrhage, lens injury, uveal prolapse and retinal detachment.

Conclusion

We can conclude from our study that blunt trauma is the commonest mode of ocular injury. RTA, physical assault and sport related injuries are common causes of blunt ocular trauma. Young adult males are more vulnerable. Intraocular hemorrhage (hyphema & vitreous hemorrhage), zone III injury, posterior segment involvement and low ocular trauma score (category I & II) are poor prognostic factors.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

CA Mccarty CL Fu HR Taylor Epidemiology of ocular trauma in AustraliaOphthalmology19991069184752

2 

OD Schein PL Hibberd BJ Shingleton T Kunzweiler DA Frambach JM Seddon The Spectrum and burden of ocular injuryOphthalmology19889533005

3 

RP Maurya T Srivastav VP Singh CP Mishra A Al-Mujaini The epidemiology of ocular trauma in northern india; A teaching hospital studyOman J Ophthalmol20191227883

4 

B Shukla R Agarwal D Shukla S Seen Systematic analysis of ocular trauma by a new proposed ocular trauma classificationIndian J Ophthalmol201765871922

5 

J Katz JM Tielsch Lifetime prevalence of ocular injuries from the Baltimore eye surveyArch Ophthalmol19931111115648

6 

T Jahangir NH Butt U Hazma H Tayyab S Jahangir Pattern of Presentation and Factors Leading to Ocular TraumaPak J Ophthalmol199327296102

7 

R Koval J Teller M Belkin M Romem L Yanko H Savir The Israili Ocular injury study: A nationwise collaborative studyArch Ophthalmol1988106677680

8 

IP Parmar RC Nagpal S Sunandan Pattern of ocular injuries in HaryanaIndian J Ophthalmol19853331414

9 

JA Pearlman KGA Eong F Kuhn DJ Pieramici Airbags and Eye injuries : epidemiology,spectrum of injury, and analysis of risk factorsSurv Ophthalmol200146323442

10 

RP Maurya P Kumar I Yadav P Bhusan VP Singh MK Singh Cow horn injury causing scleral rupture with subconjunctival dislocation of cataractous lensMed Res Chronicles2015215660

11 

JR Wolter Coup-contrecoup mechanism of ocular injuriesAm J Ophthalmol19635678596

12 

CJ Macewen PS Baines P Desai Eye injuries in children: The current pictureBr J Ophthalmol19998389336

13 

MD Adamu N Muhammad Pattern of ocular trauma in Gusau, North west NigeriaNiger J Ophthalmol2017251113

14 

GS Titiyal C Prakash S Gupta V Joshi Pattern of ocular trauma in tertiary care hospital of Kumaon RegionJ Indian Acad Forensic Med20133521169

15 

MY Wong RE Man P Gupta C Sabanayagam TY Wong C Yu Prevalence, subtypes, severity and determinants of ocular trauma: The Singapore Chinies Eye StudyBr J Ophthalmol20181022049

16 

OL Okoye Eye injury requiring hospitalization in Enugu, Nigeria. A one-year surveyNiger Surg Res200681347

17 

A Kaur A Agarwal Pediatric ocular traumaCurr Sci200589436

18 

M Krishnan R Sreenivasan Ocular injuries in union territory of Pondicherry .Clinical presentationIndian J Ophthalmol199836825

19 

G Nayagam M Raman A Anuradha S Sheela N Chakravarthy Assessment of visual prognosis using ocular trauma score in open globe injury at a tertiary care centreTNOA J Ophthalmic Sci Res202058913

20 

R Saxena R Sinha A Purohit T Dada RB Vajpayee RV Azad Pattern of pediatric ocular trauma in indiaIndian J Pediatr200269108637

21 

F Oluyemi Epidemiology of penetrating eye injury in Ibadan: A 10 year hospital-based reviewMiddle East Afr J Ophthalmol20111815963

22 

MA Sujatha A Nazlin S Prakash S Nousheen Prevalence of Visual Impairment after Blunt Ocular Trauma in a Tertiary HospitalInt J Sci Stud201534369

23 

L Dandona R Dandona M Srinivas RK John CA McCarty GN Rao Ocular trauma in an urban population in southern india ;the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease StudyClin Exp Ophthalmol20002853506

24 

PK Nirmalan J Katz JM Tielsch A L Robin RD Thulasiraj R Krishnadas Ocular trauma in a rural south Indian population: The Arvind comprehensive Eye SurveyOphthalmology200411191777881

25 

E Syal M Dhawan SP Singh To study the epidemiological and clinical profile of ocular trauma at a tertiary health-care facilityDelta J Ophthalmol201819425967

26 

AR Smith SB O'Hagan GA Gole Epidemiology of open- and closed-globe trauma presenting to Cairns Base Hospital, QueenslandClin Exp Ophthalmol20063432529

27 

BS Oum JS Lee YS Han Clinical features of ocular trauma in emergency department KoreanJ Ophalmol200418708

28 

RP Maurya S Prakash PR Sen SK Gautam S Singh Profile of assault victims attending an emergency outpatient department of a teaching hospital in IndiaSch J App Med Sci201531B927

29 

SG Pai SJ Karnath S D’Souza L Dudeja A clinical study of blunt trauma in a Tertiary care centreOnline J Health Allied Sci201312210

30 

BA Akbar M Khadadad ES Alaleh Prevalence of hyphaema and its complications in patients with blunt eye traumaMed Sci J Islam Azad Univ20094425964

31 

GM Mackay Incidence of trauma to the eyes of car occupantsTrans Ophthalmol Soc U K1975953114

32 

RP Maurya VP Singh SM Ul-Kadir JK Das The study of simultaneous bilateral ocular trauma in Northern India :clinical presentation, epidemiology and patterns of injuryInt Ophthalmol202242411931203

33 

K Bucan A Matas JM Lovrić D Balistic IP Borjan L Puljak Epidemiology of ocular trauma in childrenrequiring hospital admission:A16 - year retrospective cohort studyJ Glob Health20177101041510.7189/jogh.07.010415

34 

TF Babar MN Khan SU Jan SA Shah M Zaman MD Khan Frequency and causes of bilateral occular traumaJ Coll Physicians Surg Pak2007171167982

35 

LT Ababneh H Mohidat H Abdelnabi MF Kana'an NA Tashtush OS El-Mulki Hospital-based ocular trauma: Factors, Treatment, and Impact OutcomeClin Ophthalmol201913211926

36 

M Soni IU Khan Z Jadoon The pattern of ocular trauma in patients at Govt. Naseerullah Khan Babar Memorial Hospital, Peshawar (A study from 2010-2014)Ophthalmol Update201532422175

37 

A Mishra AK Verma The pattern and visual outcomes of non-operational role: a 36 months retrospective analysisJ Clin Ophthalmol Res2014231414

38 

E Marudhamuthu N Sivakumar T Kumaravel Study of ocular injuries in road traffic accident patientsJ Eval Med Sci2017641321922

39 

PE Ligett KJ Pince W Barlow M Ragen SJ Ryan Ocular trauma in an urban population. Review of 1132 casesOphthalmology19909755814

40 

P Desai CJ Macewen P Baines DC Minassain Incidence of cases of ocular trauma admitted to hospital and incidence of blinding outcomeBr J Ophthalmol19768075926

41 

I Rahman A Maino D Devadason B Leatherbarrow Open globe injuries: factors predictive of poor outcomesEye (Lond)20062012133641



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Original Article


Article page

458-467


Authors Details

Rajendra Prakash Maurya, Virendra Pratap Singh, Swati Gautam, Asha, Anil Kumar, C. P Mishra, P Jain, Anjali Singh*, Shivangi Singh, Syeed Mehbub Ul Kadir, Farzad Pakdel, Ekagrata Shukla, Amit Patel


Article History

Received : 12-11-2022

Accepted : 18-11-2022


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files