Introduction
Refractive errors are one of the most common causes of visual impairment around the world and second leading cause of treatable blindness.1 When uncorrected, refractive errors can affect children adversely in the form of learning problems, poor performance at school lowered self-esteem, hampering of day to day activities and hence can affect future of the child. Childhood blindness and visual impairment are important and perhaps more devastating & disabling than adult onset blindness because a child spends twice the number of blind years than a person blind due to cataract.
Studies show that in India 6-7% of children in the age group of 10-15 years have refractive errors affecting their learning at school.2 This study aims to assess the prevalence of various refractive errors in children.
Materials and Methods
This is a hospital based prospective study which was done in children attending ophthalmology OPD of Shadan hospital, Shadan institute of medical sciences which is a teaching institute located in south India.
Sample size
173 children who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study.
Ethical consideration
The study was done after getting clearance from the institutional ethics committee.
Data collection
An informed written consent was obtained in every case, and patients with defective vision were subjected to the following tests.
Visual acuity was tested by snellen’s chart. Illiterate E and Lea symbol chart were used in pre school children. It was followed by autorefractometry and wet retinoscopy with the help of 1% cyclopentolate eye drops. The post mydriatic test was carried out on 3rd day of dilatation. The children were categorized into various refractive error subtypes depending on the power of lens that could correct the error. It was as follows:
Low hyperopia upto +2D, moderate hyperopia from +2D to +5D and high hypermetropia as >5D low myopia as <3D, moderate myopia as 3D-6D and high myopia as >6D.
A difference of 0 25D in between 2 principle meridians of the eye was considered astigmatism.
Statistical analysis
Data was entered in MS-excel and analysis was done using SPSS version 20.
Descriptive statistical analysis was done. Results on continuous measurement are represented as mean and standard deviation. Results on categorical measurements are presented as percentages.
Chi square test was used to find out the significance of study parameters on a categorical scale between 2 groups.
Paired t-test was used to find out the significance of study parameters on a continuous scale between 2 groups made under 2 different conditions.
Results
The present study analysed 173 children with refractive errors, aged 5-12 years without any other organic diseases of eye. It was done in the ophthalmology out patient department of Shadan hospital.
Distribution of children according to their age is presented in table 1. The majority of children that were examined were in the age group of 10-12 yrs (58.4%). The least number of children were in 5-7 yrs group (19.1%). Mean age was 9.62 years, with 95% CI of 9.31 to 9.94. The median was 10 years, with SD of 2.09. Minimum age was 5 yrs and maximum was 12 yrs.
Table 1
Age Group |
Frequency |
Percent |
5-7years |
33 |
19.1% |
8-9 years |
39 |
22.5% |
10-12 years |
101 |
58.4% |
Total |
173 |
100% |
Table 3 shows the sex distribution according to age of children, most of them being females in age group of 10-12yrs, accounting for 61.6% of the total children. The majority of males(54.1%) and females(61.6%) belonged to 10-12 years age group.
Table 3
Age group |
Female |
Male |
Total |
5-7 years |
16 |
17 |
33 |
16.2% |
23.0% |
19.1% |
|
8-9 years |
22 |
17 |
39 |
22.% |
23.% |
22.5% |
|
10-12 years |
61 |
40 |
101 |
61.6% |
54.1% |
58.4% |
Table 4 represents the frequency and percentage of various refractive errors in study group.the majority fell into myopia group (52%), next being hypermetropia (27.2%) and least, astigmatism accounting for 20.8% of the total refractive anomalies. Among the cases of astigmatism, majority(72.2%) belonged to myopic astigmatism group.
Table 4
Type |
Frequency |
Percentage |
Astigmatism |
36 |
20.8 |
Myopic |
26 |
72.2 |
Hyperopic |
4 |
11.1 |
Mixed |
6 |
16.7 |
Myopia |
90 |
52.0 |
Hypermetropia |
47 |
27.2 |
Table 5 shows the distribution of refractive anomalies according to the sex of children with myopia and astigmatism showing predominance of females 57.6% and 21.2%, respectively and 35.1% males falling into hypermetropia.
Table 5
Refractive error |
Male (%) |
Female(%) |
Total(%) |
Myopia |
33(44.6) |
57(57.6) |
90(52.0) |
Hypermetropia |
26(35.1) |
21(21.2) |
47(27.2) |
Astigmatism |
15(20.3) |
21(21.2) |
36(20.8) |
Total(%) |
74(100) |
99(100) |
173(100) |
Table 6 shows distribution of refractive anomalies according to various age groups. Myopia was found to be more common in 10-12 years of age group accounting for 72.2% of all myopic children and 37.5% of all refractive errors with p-value of <0.01 which is statistically significant. Astigmatism was the least common in 5-7 (5;15.2%) and 8-9 (9;23.1%) age groups. Hypermetropia accounted for least number of refractive anomalies among 10-12 years group (14;13.9%).
Table 6
It shows that highest parental association rate is present in myopia (55.5%).
Table 7
Refractive error |
Parental association |
Percentage |
Myopia |
39 |
57.4% |
Hyperopia |
14 |
20.6% |
Astigmatism |
15 |
22.1% |
Mean refractive error was -1.047 with 95% CI of -1.32 to -0.77. The SD was - 2.57 with minimum value of -10.5 maximum value of 5.75 and median of -0.75.
Low myopia (<3D) was the most common (66;38.1%), with females contributing to most of them (42;24.2%). Least were children with high hypermetropia with only one male child.
Discussion
Screening and diagnosis of refractive abnormalities must be carried out in children from a very young age as when undetected and uncorrected they remain a significant cause of amblyopia and strabismus. It is important to timely determine the existence, amount and difference of refractive anomalies in both eyes in this vulnerable population.
Refraction of the eye changes through-out life. During the growth of the eye, the process of emmetropization normally occurs i.e., harmonization of refractive and axial parameters and formation of emmetropic relations within normal biological variation.
Refractive errors are among the leading causes of visual impairment worldwide and are responsible for high rates of low vision and blindness in certain areas. The refractive error study in children in China3 Chile4 and Nepal5 is the first multicountry population based assessment of refractive errors in children. The data reveals that there are significant and large geographic differences in the prevalence of refractive errors and that uncorrected refractive errors are very common.
Our study investigated the most common type of refractive error and its correlation with age and gender of the study population. In our study, myopia was found to be the most common refractive error (52.0%), followed by hyperopia (27.2%) and least number of cases were astigmatic (20.8%). Findings from some studies from different countries like China,3 Chile,4 Kenya,6 Malawi,7 India,8, 9, 10 and Nepal5 have shown similar results i.e.,myopia was the most common type of refractive error.
This consistent lower prevalence of hypermetropia in school going children is due to the emmetropization process of the eye and the children experience loss of hypermetropia after 6 to 8 yrs of age.11, 12
Ali in Pakistan reported a positive familial history of wearing spectacles at 57% and indicates a very strong relationship between refractive errors and hereditary or familial factors.13
Conclusions
Myopia was the most common type of refractive error and there is no statistical significance of the relation between sex and type of refractive error.