Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Print ISSN: 2395-1443

Online ISSN: 2395-1451

CODEN : IJCEKF

Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (IJCEO) is open access, a peer-reviewed medical journal, published quarterly, online, and in print, by the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF) since 2015. To fulfil our aim of rapid dissemination of knowledge, we publish articles ‘Ahead of Print’ on acceptance. In addition, the journal allows free access (Open Access) to its content, which is likely to attract more readers and citations of articles published in IJCEO. Manuscripts must be prepared in more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 354

PDF Downloaded: 236


Get Permission Ganekal and Ganekal: Anterior capsule sparing parsplana lensectomy in cataract with severely compromised corneal endothelium


Introduction

Corneal endothelium plays a crucial role in the maintenance of corneal transparency. Abnormality of corneal endothelium in quantity or quality might lead to bullous keratopathy, or decompensation of corneal endothelium. It is well-known that traditional cataract surgery, either phacoemulsification or extra capsular cataract extraction, causes damage to the corneal endothelium due to the manipulations in the anterior chamber1, 2, 3, 4 and it was believed by many surgeons that severely abnormal corneal endothelium was a relative contraindication to cataract surgery.

Pars plana lensectomy (PPL) is another technique of cataract surgery which extracts the cataractous lens from the vitreous cavity. This technique is able to avoid the manipulations in the anterior chamber and hence may decrease surgically-induced damage to the corneal endothelium. PPL is often performed to extract dislocated lens,5 or as a procedure during combined cataract and vitreo-retinal surgery,6 or on pediatric cataract patients.7 Encouraged by the good results, we introduced PPL to manage cataract with severely abnormal corneal endothelium from October 2018. This study comprised of 22 patients with severely abnormal corneal endothelium but still had transparent cornea, who underwent PPL as the technique of cataract extraction.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective analysis of 22 consecutive patients who had cataract with severely compromised corneal endothelium but still transparent cornea, and received PPL as the technique of cataract extraction was conducted. Of the 22 cases, 14 had history of penetrating keratoplasty, 6 had history of trabeculectomy and 2 were diagnosed as Fuch’s endothelial dystrophy before surgery. Preoperative examination included anterior segment evaluation by slit lamp, posterior segment evaluation by slit lamp biomicroscopy using either super vitreo-fundus lens, when fundus could be viewed, or by B-scan ultrasonography when media opacity blocked the viewing of fundus. Preoperative cell count of their corneal endothelium was between 844 to 1176 cells/mm2. To prevent postoperative retinal detachment, the peripheral fundus was paid special attention laser photocoagulation was conducted if there were any retinal breaks orlattice degeneration. The density and morphology of corneal endothelial cells were found using SP-3000 specular biomicroscope. All the patients received pars plana vitrecomy (PPV) and PPL, combined with phacofragmentation in 6 eyes because of hard nucleus, retinal photo coagulation in 7 eyes and CF temponade in 8 eyes to prevent retinal complications, primary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in 1 eye and secondary IOL implantation in 4 eyes.

Surgical technique

The procedure of PPL was performed with PPV under retrobulbar or peribulbar anesthesia with maximal mydriasis. Three small conjunctival flaps and accordingly three 20G scleral ports were made 3.5 mm behind the limbus at the position of 2 and 10 o’clock and inferiotemporally. The inferiotemporal port was connected with irrigation, the 2 o’clock port was used for illumination, and the 10 o’clock port for vitrectomy, lensectomy, photocoagulation, etc. Anterior vitrectomy was performed to remove the nearby vitreous. With the vitreous cutter, a 5 mm×5mm opening of posterior capsule was made. If the nucleus was soft, a deep groove of nucleus was made from behind. The nucleus was then pushed down into the vitreous cavity, usually turned into two halves at this time. The remaining cortex behind the anterior capsule was aspirated and the epithelial cells on the posterior surface of the capsule were removed with the cutter by means of low-vacuum polishing. A plano-concave lens was placed on the cornea for better viewing of the posterior vitreous cavity. The nucleus was then removed half by half using the vitreous cutter. If the nucleus was hard, a phacoemulsifier was used to remove the hard nucleus in the vitreous cavity by means of phacofragmentation. A thorough fundus examination was conducted, with particular attention paid to the peripheral retina. Retinal photocoagulation, C3F8 tamponade was performed whenever there might be any risks for retinal detachment. Finally, the three scleral ports were closed by one stitch respectively using 6-0 absorbable suture. IOL implantation, either primary or secondary, was performed using a 3.0 mm corneo-scleral tunnel incision. Viscoelastic agent was injected into the anterior chamber and between the iris and the capsule. IOL was injected in with a projector and was fixed in sulcus. Viscoelastic agents were then carefully washed out by a cannula tip to avoid damage to the corneal endothelium.

Main outcome measures

The follow-up examination also included BCVA, slitlamp biomicroscopy, slitlamp biomicroscopy with a Super Vitreo-fundus lens, and corneal endothelial cells evaluation by Topcon SP-3000 specular biomicroscope. Postoperative complications were also recorded.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were made using paired t-test by SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS

Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Unless otherwise indicated, the results are expressed as the mean±SD.

Results

Between October 2018 and September 2020, 22 consecutive patients of cataract with severely abnormal/compromised corneal endothelium but still transparent cornea received PPL as the technique of cataract extraction. Twenty two eyes of 22 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the 9 women and 13 men was 50.8 years ±12.5 (SD) (range 21 to 72 years). Mean follow-up was 17.2±6.4 months (ranged 6 to 31 months). Preoperatively, BCVA was PL present in 3 patients, FC in 4 patients, all below 6/60. Postoperative BCVA was 6/60 or below in 2 patients, 6/60-6/18 in 7 patients, 6/18 - 6/12 in 7 patients and 6/12 or better in 6 patients. BCVA improved in all patients after surgery, but in one patient with Fuch’s endothelial dystrophy BCVA turned worse again about five months after surgery and eventually bullous keratopathy occurred. She was then transferred to cornea specialist and received penetrating keratoplasty. The mean density of corneal endothelial cells was 1018± 84/ mm2 (range 844/ mm2 to 1176/ mm2) before operation and 981±93/ mm2 (range 853 to 1211/ mm2) after operation (Fig 1). No significant difference in the density of corneal endothelial cells was found among the patients before and after operation (P=0.43). Postoperative complications are shown in Table 1. Anterior capsule opacification developed in 10 patients, of which 8 had Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy and 2 had surgical capsulotomy at the time of secondary IOL implantation. BCVA improved and cornea remained transparent after capsulotomy in all patients. Bullous keratopathy occurred in one female patient with Fuch’s endothelial dystrophy. Her BCVA remained 6/6 for aproximately five months after PPL and then turned worse because of corneal edema. She therefore received penetrating keratoplasty and regained BCVA of 6/12.No patient had obvious uveitis on slitlamp examination, and none had retinal detachment (Figure 2).

Figure 1

Density of corneal endothelial cells before (A) and 5 days after surgery (B) in a patient who had the history of trabeculectomy and received PPL as the technique of cataract extraction

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/5b7fe08f-b94d-4005-b7ed-ae3c2f6ef78aimage1.jpeg

Figure 2

Slitlamp examination before (A) and 5 days after surgery (B) in the same patient who had the history of trabeculectomy and received PPL as the technique of cataract extraction.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/5b7fe08f-b94d-4005-b7ed-ae3c2f6ef78aimage2.png

Table 1

Postoperative complications

Complications

Number of cases

Capsule opacification

10

Bullous keratopathy

1

Uveitis

0

Retinal detachment

0

Discussion

Corneal endothelium is a hexagonal non-replicating monolayer of neural crest–derived tissue that regulates the hydration state of corneal stroma. It’s a tissue that contains large quantities of membrane-bound Na+, K+-ATPase with specialized intercellular junctions that establish a pump–leak process in the maintenance of corneal deturgescence, and thus plays a crucial role in keeping the cornea transparent. Certain density and proper morphology of endothelial cells are important to maintain this function. This delicate tissue is, however, subject to alteration from age, trauma, systemic or ocular diseases, surgery and some dystrophic conditions. Because of the non-replicating propriety, repair of the damaged areas takes place via the process of cell migration from adjacent undamaged areas. Thus, a permanent reduction in cell density occurs, and individual cell size is increased. When the cell density drops beneath a threshold, the endothelium would no longer be able to work properly, and permanent cornea edema or bullous keratopathy occurs. We usually take corneal endothelial cell density of 1200 cells/mm as the threshold. Beneath the threshold, traditional cataract surgery should be carefully considered. The fast development of PPV has promoted PPL, which extracts the cataractous lens from the vitreous cavity, as a technique of cataract surgery. This technique is able to avoid the manipulations in the anterior chamber, and hence may decrease surgically-induced damage to the corneal endothelium. Although it is not a routine cataract surgery at present because of some severe complications such as retinal detachment and macular interference, PPL is often performed to extract dislocated lens5 or as a procedure during combined cataract and vitreo-retinal surgery6 or on pediatric cataract patients.7 It was based on two points that we introduced PPL into the management of cataract with severely abnormal corneal endothelium. Firstly, although few studies had reported the influence of PPL on corneal endothelium in the literature, theoretically however, this influence would be much less than that of phacoemulsificaion or extracapsular cataract surgery. Secondly, modern PPV had decreased the complications of PPL into a receivable level. Excellent visualization, high-speed cutting and prophylactic photocoagulation had greatly reduced the retinal and macular complications. Our present study showed this technique is promising. Of the 22 cataract patients who had received PPL because of severely abnormal corneal endothelium, only one had bullous keratopathy. Because the complication occurred five months after surgery, we would rather think that this represent the natural course of gradual deterioration of Fuch’s endothelial dystrophy. This study, however, was based on a small sample. More patients should be observed to further determine the influence of PPL on the corneal endothelium. The prominent complication of PPV in our study was anterior capsule opacification, with a prevalence rate of 47.6%. Compared with the posterior capsule, the anterior capsule possesses a monolayer of epithelial cells on its inner surface. This might account for the high prevalence of anterior capsule opacification. Capsule opacification can be managed by one of two methods: prophylactic capsulotomy intraoperatively or Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy post operatively. To further reduce anterior chamber interference, the latter was selected in our study. No patient had developed bullous keratopathy after Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

J Richard L Hoffart F Chavane B Ridings J Conrath Corneal endothelial cell loss after cataract extraction by using ultrasound phacoemulsification versus a fluid-based systemCornea20082711721

2 

A Baradaran-Rafii M Rahmati-Kamel M Eslani V Kiavash F Karimian Effect of hydrodynamic parameters on corneal endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsificationJ Cataract Refract Surg20093547327

3 

M Wilczynski E Supady P Loba A Synder D Palenga-Pydyn W Omulecki Comparison of early corneal endothelial cell loss after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincisionJ Cataract Refract Surg200935915704

4 

A Matheu M Castilla F Duch M Martí J Lillo M Gil Manual nucleofragmentation and endothelial cell lossJ Cataract Refract Surg19972379959

5 

J Oh WE Smiddy Pars plana lensectomy combined with pars plana vitrectomy for dislocated cataractJ Cataract Refract Surg2010367118994

6 

P Romero M Salvat M Almena M Baget I Méndez Combined surgery for lens extraction, vitrectomy, and implantation in the diabetic patient using phacoemulsification versus phacofragmentationJ Fr Ophtalmol200629553341

7 

M Onol S Ozdek Z Aktas B Hasanreisoglu Long-term results of pars plana lensectomy with double-capsule-supported intraocular lens implantation in childrenCan J Ophthalmol20084366737



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Original Article


Article page

224-227


Authors Details

Sunil Ganekal*, Varun Ganekal


Article History

Received : 24-01-2022

Accepted : 21-03-2022


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files