Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Print ISSN: 2395-1443

Online ISSN: 2395-1451

CODEN : IJCEKF

Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (IJCEO) is open access, a peer-reviewed medical journal, published quarterly, online, and in print, by the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF) since 2015. To fulfil our aim of rapid dissemination of knowledge, we publish articles ‘Ahead of Print’ on acceptance. In addition, the journal allows free access (Open Access) to its content, which is likely to attract more readers and citations of articles published in IJCEO. Manuscripts must be prepared in more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 508

PDF Downloaded: 427


Get Permission Gupta and Chaurasiya: Changes in symptoms of dry eyes in health professionals with increased duration of wearing the mask


Introduction

Dry eye disease is multifactorial disease of the tears and ocular surface that resulting in ocular discomfort, visual disturbance, and tear film instability.1 During the COVID-19 pandemic, the widespread use of face masks was considered as a key measure to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2.2 During this pandemic era, the whole world has observed the corresponding increase in ocular symptoms like irritation, itching, dryness among the population who are using a regular face mask.3 In normal population and patient, significant increases in dry eye symptoms has been observed among regular mask user. This group includes individuals who have never previously suffered from dry eyes.3 As the world has not received proper management and medication against the SARS-CoV-2, using of the mask remains a part of our daily routine.4 The majority of the population described an awareness of air blowing upward from the mask into their eyes.5 This increased airflow likely increases the evaporation of the tear film which, when continuous for hours or days, may result in ocular surface irritation or inflammation.6 The purpose of the study was to observe the association between symptoms of dry eyes and the duration of using a mask.

Materials and Methods

A Prospective cross-sectional study was carried among 39 health care professionals aged between 20 years and 30 years. An unspecified questionnaire was distributed using Google Forms through different social media platforms, asking each respondent to contribute to the survey by completing the questionnaire and also to share with their social contacts. Data were collected from December 2021 to January 2021. Participants were asked to respond about their age, gender, profession, and the frequency and its severity of dry eye symptoms (i.e. foreign body sensation, dryness, irritation, itching, burning or watering). For symptoms frequency, participants could select never, sometimes, often, always based on the Likert scale. Participants responding to symptoms of dry eyes were asked about the severity using a pre-validated SPEED Questionnaire.7 Participants were also asked if they wore glasses or contact lenses. The working definition of MADE (Mask Associated Dry Eye) was defined as the condition in which dry eye symptoms are present at least sometimes in an individual wearing a mask for 2 hours. By this definition, the individual who was wearing a mask for more than 2 hours was included in the study. The individual who was not wearing masks or wearing masks less than 2 hours were excluded from the study.

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software8 (IBM SPSS, version 25; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive analysis was done to summarize the result in mean and Standard deviation and an Odd Ratio was performed to calculate the risk factor for dry eye using 95% Confidence Interval (CI) and P-value (< 0.05). Similarly, Data Normality was evaluated by using the Shapiro-Wilk test (P < 0.05). Spearman rank correlation test was performed to know the effect of severity and frequency of dry eyes symptoms on the duration of wearing masks. Statistical Significance was considered if P-value was less than 0.05.

Result

A total of 50 responses was collected, 11 questionnaires were removed due to incomplete data, leaving 39 questionnaires for analysis. The respondent age was between 20 and 30 years (mean age 24.69; SD 3.56).

About one-third of participants (38.5%) had worn a Cloth mask, 15.4% N95 with valve, 30.8% N95 without valve and 15.4% surgical mask (Figure 1). The sample consists of 22(56.4%) female respondents and 17(43.6%) male respondents. Dryness was not associated with gender [Odd ratio 1.04; CI 95%; (0.474-1.26)]. Similarly, Using Spearman’s Rank Correlation to test the association between frequencies of symptoms for dryness was 0.277 (27.7%) which was not statistically significant (P = 0.086). However, this result showed that there was a positive correlation between frequencies of symptoms for dryness with a duration of using masks (Table 1).

Regarding the severity of dry eye symptoms, there was also no significant relationship with the duration of mask-wearing (r = 0.171; P = 0.297). However, the relationship showed there would be an increase (17.1%) in the severity of symptoms with per hour increase in the duration of wearing a mask (Table 2).

Nevertheless, there was a statistically significant relationship between severity of the symptoms and frequency of symptoms (r = 0.638; P = 0.000) which showed a positive correlation (Table 3).

Figure 1

Graph showing percentage of respondents using different types of mask

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/a188f072-824f-4631-ba4a-7691a830f5a8image1.png

Table 1

Showing association between frequency of symptoms with hours of using the mask (Significance Level: P < 0.05)

Hours of using Mask

Frequency of Symptoms

Spearman's rho

Hours of using Mask

Correlation Coefficient

1.000

.277

Sig. (2-tailed)

.

.088

N

39

39

Frequency of Symptoms

Correlation Coefficient

.277

1.000

Sig. (2-tailed)

.088

.

N

39

39

Table 2

Showing association between Severity of symptoms with hours of using the mask (Significance Level: P < 0.05)

Hours of using Mask

Severity

Spearman's rho

Hours of using Mask

Correlation Coefficient

1.000

.171

Sig. (2-tailed)

.

.297

N

39

39

Severity

Correlation Coefficient

.171

1.000

Sig. (2-tailed)

.297

.

N

39

39

Table 3

Showing association between frequency and severity of symptoms for dry eyes (Significance Level: P < 0.05)

Severity

Frequency of Symptoms

Spearman's rho

Severity

Correlation Coefficient

1.000

.638**

Sig. (2-tailed)

.

.000

N

39

39

Frequency of Symptoms

Correlation Coefficient

.638**

1.000

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

.

N

39

39

[i] ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Discussion

Dry eye disease is common ocular surface disorder and its symptoms include foreign body sensation, dryness /grittiness, itching, burning, stinging, tearing, photophobia, fluctuating or blurry vision.9 The present study aimed to correlate the symptoms of dryness and its severity with the increased duration of wearing masks in the health care population. About two-thirds of the participants who responded to the survey had dry eye symptoms with the frequency of sometimes on the Likert scale and an increase in the symptoms was seen with an increase in the duration of wearing the mask. The frequency of ocular discomfort was significantly higher in the present study than reported previously.10 However, Chalmers et al.10 reported that clinicians often underestimated the severity of participant’s self-assessment of dry eye symptoms. As face masks are necessary, along with social distancing and hygiene measures, to slow down the spread of COVID-19,2 it is important not to underestimate all symptoms that could bring negative psychological impact within the population from using them.

The majority of studies report a significantly higher prevalence of dry eye disease in women compared to men.11 The results of the present study contrast with the previous study as there was no statistical significance of MADE based on gender distribution.

Although a higher prevalence of dry eyes disease in older people are described in the literatures,12 the worsening of symptoms due to the use of the mask was not correlated with age in this study. The mean population age of our study was 24.69 years which could be the reason for not correlating with age factor. Further study needs to be carried out in different age groups for better understanding of symptoms of MADE with age.

The warming and sweating along with difficulty in breathing was found to be highly associated (odd ratio=1.56) when using cloth masks.13 Moreover, Matusiak et al.13 documented that wearing surgical masks was linked to a significantly lower risk of adverse reactions than cloth masks or respirators (N95 + FFP). This is supported by Roberge et al.14 who postulated that surgical mask use at a low-moderate work rate was not associated with clinically significant physiological impact, but it would be useful to verify if the use of different types of masks may have effects on ocular discomfort. The present study also reports that about two-thirds of the population was using cloth masks. This can be a reason for an increase in the frequency of symptoms with an increase in the duration of wearing a mask.

The present study found that the frequency of symptoms for dry eyes like irritation, watering had a positive correlation with the increased hour of using a mask. Similar findings were noted in the Marinova et al.15 where the parameter like burning, tearing of eyes, dry eye feeling, irritation was reported in a maximum number of regular protective mask user (RPMU). These frequencies were very low in occasional mask wear.

Additionally, there was a positive correlation between the time of mask usage and the presence and severity of the complaints (Spearman’s Correlation coefficient r = 0.437, p < 0.001).15 The present study reflects the same finding that suggests the positive correlation between duration of mask-wearing and severity of symptoms (Spearman’s Correlation coefficient r = 0.171; P = 0.297).

Interestingly, some studies are being conducted to find symptoms for dry eyes in COVID-19- positive patients.16, 17 While these articles suggest dry eye as a complication, we assume that our findings may be partially associated with long-term mask use in these individuals, rather than sequence of COVID-19.

In an online survey-based study18 on mask-associated ocular symptoms (self-reported), there was no significant association found between age, pre-existing ocular discomfort, refractive correction, and mask-associated dry eye. The present study also showed no relationship between age, gender and dry eye symptoms.

Conclusion

The study highlighted the association of severity and frequency of dry eyes in an individual wearing mask for a long period of time. The finding reflects that the frequencies of the dry eyes along with the severity will increase with the increasing duration of wearing the mask. Moreover, it also suggests that cloth mask is the probable predisposing factor for the increase in dry eye symptoms. Further study can be added considering age factors to associate the severity of dryness.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

L Dorenavar RP Maurya VP Singh MK Singh K Sharma R Sharma The role of Rebampipde ophthalmic suspension in management of dry eye diseaseIndian J Clin Exp Ophthalmol2015141916

2 

World Health Organization. Advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19. 2020 (accessed 25 Oct 2020)https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public/when-and-how-to-use-masks

3 

M Moshirfar WB West DP Marx Face Mask-Associated Ocular Irritation and DrynessOphthalmol Ther202093397400

4 

S Feng C Schen N Xia W Song M Fan BJ Cowling Rational use of face masks in the COVID-19 pandemicLancet Respir Med2020854346

5 

JB Powell JH Kim RJ Roberge Powered air-purifying respirator use in healthcare: effects on thermal sensations and comfortJ Occup Environ Hyg2017141294754

6 

RJ Dennis RE Miller RD Peterson WG Jackson Contact lens wear with the USAF protective integrated hood/mask chemical defense ensembleAviat Space Environ Med199263756571

7 

N Keir W Ngo P Situ D Korb C Blackie T Simpson Evaluation of the standard patient evaluation of eye dryness (SPEED) questionnaire Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci201354156028

8 

S Landau BS Everitt A handbook of statistical analyses using SPSSTaylor & Francis2003

9 

RP Maurya VP Singh S Chaudhary M Roy T Srivastava M Rajan Prevalence of severe dry eye disease in postmenopausal women in North India A teaching hospital studyIndian J Obstet Gynecol Res201961946

10 

RL Chalmers CG Begley T Edrington The agreement between self-assessment and clinician assessment of dry eye severityCornea20052480410

11 

F Stapleton M Alves VY Bunya TFOS DEWS II epidemiology reportOcul Surf20171533465

12 

CS DePaiva Effects of aging in dry eyeInt Ophthalmol Clin2017574764

13 

Ł Matusiak M Szepietowska P Krajewski R Białynicki-Birula JC Szepietowski Inconveniences due to the use of face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey study of 876 young peopleDermatol Ther2020334e1356710.1111/dth.13567

14 

RJ Roberge JH Kim SM Benson Absence of consequential changes in physiological, thermal and subjective responses from wearing a surgical maskRespir Physiol Neurobiol201218112935

15 

E Marinova D Dabov Y Zdravkov Ophthalmic complaints in face-mask wearing: prevalence, treatment, and prevention with a potential protective effect against SARS-CoV-2Biotechnol Biotechnol Equipment2020341132335

16 

N Hong W Yu J Xia Y Shen M Yap W Han Evaluation of ocular symptoms and tropism of SARS-CoV-2 in patients confirmed with COVID-19Acta Ophthalmol2020

17 

P Wu F Duan C Luo Q Liu X Qu L Liang Characteristics of ocular findings of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19JAMA Ophthalmol2020138575578

18 

L Boccardo Self-reported symptoms of mask-associated dry eye: A survey study of 3,605 peopleCont Lens Anterior Eye202110140810.1016/j.clae.2021.01.003



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Original Article


Article page

659-662


Authors Details

Akansha Gupta*, Ritesh Kumar Chaurasiya


Article History

Received : 21-06-2021

Accepted : 12-08-2021


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files