Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Print ISSN: 2395-1443

Online ISSN: 2395-1451

CODEN : IJCEKF

Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (IJCEO) is open access, a peer-reviewed medical journal, published quarterly, online, and in print, by the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF) since 2015. To fulfil our aim of rapid dissemination of knowledge, we publish articles ‘Ahead of Print’ on acceptance. In addition, the journal allows free access (Open Access) to its content, which is likely to attract more readers and citations of articles published in IJCEO. Manuscripts must be prepared in more...

Article type

Original Article


Article page

142- 145


Authors Details

Maheshwara N*, Ravindra Naik K, Vivek P


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files

   






Article statistics

Viewed: 1344

PDF Downloaded: 691


A comparative study of visual evoked potentials with automated Humphrey visual fields in patients with primary open angle glaucoma


Original Article

Author Details : Maheshwara N*, Ravindra Naik K, Vivek P

Volume : 5, Issue : 2, Year : 2019

Article Page : 142-145

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijceo.2019.035



Suggest article by email

Get Permission

Abstract

Primary open angle Glaucoma (POAG) is a chronic, progressive optic neuropathy caused by a group of ocular conditions which lead to damage of the optic nerve with loss of visual function. Various modalities are available to detect the damage to the optic nerve head and the retinal nerve fibre layer. Traditionally Visual Evoked Potentials (VEP) has been used to test optic nerve and Humphrey Visual Field Analyser with results favouring one over the other. Hence a study was conducted comparing parameters of standard VEP with the indices of Humphrey Visual Field Analyser in patients of POAG.
Material and Methods: A group of 30 diagnosed cases of primary open angle glaucoma. Selected patients were then taken up for Visual Field Analysis and VEP recordings using VEP systems as per the protocol of International society for clinical electrophysiology of vision (ISCEV). Visual field analysis was performed on Humphrey Visual Field Analyser II – series. Patient’s pupil size was noted and the test selected was central 30-2.
Results: Patients belonged to the age group of 50-54 years. About 2/3 of patients were males & about 1/3 of patients were females. Of the 60 eyes 34 eyes (56.6%) had delayed P100 latency whereas 26 eyes (43.4%) showed GHT outside normal limits. Mean of MD was more (3.54) when the GHT was the deranged parameter and less when the deranged parameter was P100 latency (2.63).
Conclusion: VEP is affected in POAG. As an independent parameter more eyes had delayed P100 values when compared to GHT. In 16/60 eyes (26.6%) the P100 latencies were affected before GHT changes in Humphrey visual fields. In this study P100 latencies were statistically significant when compared to MD & GHT index of Humphrey Perimeter.

Keywords: Glaucoma hemifield test, Humphrey visual field analysis, Primary open angle glaucoma, P100 latency, Visual evoked potentials.


How to cite : Maheshwara N, Ravindra Naik K, Vivek P, A comparative study of visual evoked potentials with automated Humphrey visual fields in patients with primary open angle glaucoma. Indian J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019;5(2):142-145

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.