Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Print ISSN: 2395-1443

Online ISSN: 2395-1451

CODEN : IJCEKF

Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (IJCEO) is open access, a peer-reviewed medical journal, published quarterly, online, and in print, by the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF) since 2015. To fulfil our aim of rapid dissemination of knowledge, we publish articles ‘Ahead of Print’ on acceptance. In addition, the journal allows free access (Open Access) to its content, which is likely to attract more readers and citations of articles published in IJCEO. Manuscripts must be prepared in more...

Article type

Original Article


Article page

137- 142


Authors Details

Rinky Saha, Prakash Kumar, Rajendra P. Maurya, Virendra P. Singh, Mahendra K. Singh, Rajesh Kumar


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files

   






Article statistics

Viewed: 1789

PDF Downloaded: 851


Endoscopic V/s External Approach DCR: A comparative Analysis


Original Article

Author Details : Rinky Saha, Prakash Kumar, Rajendra P. Maurya, Virendra P. Singh, Mahendra K. Singh, Rajesh Kumar

Volume : 1, Issue : 3, Year : 2015

Article Page : 137-142


Suggest article by email

Get Permission

Abstract

Aims & Objective: To compare the surgical procedures, intra-operative & post operative complications and overall success rate of Endoscopic Dacrocystorhinostomy (Endo-DCR) with External approach Dacrocystorhinostomy (DCR).

Materials & Methods: In this randomized, interventional, comparative study, 50 cases of mechanical Endonasal Dacrocystorhinostomy & 30 cases of conventional External Dacrocystorhinostomy were performed from January 2006 to April 2007 in the department of Ophthalmology in conjunction with department of Otorhinolaryngology, Sir Sunder Lal Hospital, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh. All patients underwent detailed general, medical and ocular history as well as thorough ocular and ENT examination to rule out any nasal pathology. Level of blockage was diagnosed by lacrimal syringing & probing, Jones dye test and dacrocystography.
Surgery was done under local anesthesia except in children and uncooperative patients where general anesthesia was used. For Endo- DCR surgery, 0 & 30 degree rigid endoscope was used. In selected cases silastic sheet were used. The surgical outcomes and complications were analyzed.
Results: Functional success and symptomatic relief were equivalent in both procedures. Endo-DCR surgery was found to be quicker to perform than external DCR surgery. The follow-up duration was comparable in both groups. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the Endo -DCR group.
Conclusion: Endo-DCR surgery offers a very attractive alternative to the well established technique of external DCR surgery for the treatment of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction with equivalent success rates, shorter surgical time and higher patient satisfaction.
 
Keywords: Chronic dacryocystitis, Endoscopic DCR, Epiphora, Endonasal DCR surgery, External DCR, Silicon intubation


How to cite : Saha R, Kumar P, Maurya R P, Singh V P, Singh M K, Kumar R, Endoscopic V/s External Approach DCR: A comparative Analysis. Indian J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015;1(3):137-142

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.