Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Print ISSN: 2395-1443

Online ISSN: 2395-1451

CODEN : IJCEKF

Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (IJCEO) is open access, a peer-reviewed medical journal, published quarterly, online, and in print, by the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF) since 2015. To fulfil our aim of rapid dissemination of knowledge, we publish articles ‘Ahead of Print’ on acceptance. In addition, the journal allows free access (Open Access) to its content, which is likely to attract more readers and citations of articles published in IJCEO. Manuscripts must be prepared in more...

Article type

Original Article


Article page

16-20


Authors Details

Eknath Biroba Shelke, Harshal Namdeorao Yerkade, Mahesh Prakashrao Sonepethkar, Pradip Bhikshukrao C


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files

   






Article statistics

Viewed: 1266

PDF Downloaded: 525


Clinical outcomes, surgeon and patient satisfaction following peribulbar versus topical anesthesia for phacoemulsification surgery and intraocular lens implantation- A comparative study


Original Article

Author Details : Eknath Biroba Shelke, Harshal Namdeorao Yerkade, Mahesh Prakashrao Sonepethkar, Pradip Bhikshukrao C

Volume : 4, Issue : 1, Year : 2018

Article Page : 16-20

https://doi.org/10.18231/2395-1451.2018.0006



Suggest article by email

Get Permission

Abstract

Introduction: Phacoemulsification technique for cataract using either peribulbar anesthesia (PA) or topical anesthesia (TA) has evolved in last decade.  Only few studies has compared between two anesthetic procedures for phacoemulsification. We compared patient and surgeon satisfaction, clinical outcome between two anesthetic procedures.
Materials and Methods: The Study was conducted during February 2017 to July 2017. Patients after being randomly assigned to group PA and TA were underwent phacoemulsification. Corneal condition, postoperative complication at day 1, best corrected visual acuity at day 40 were compared. Both patients and surgeons were asked questions on degree of analgesia and level of comfort respectively. Data was analyzed using appropriate test of significance.
Results: 50 patients were taken into study in each group. No significant difference was noted between two groups pre-operatively. Patients in PA group felt statistically significantly less pain compared to TA group (?2 = 11.78, df = 2, P = 0.0027). Satisfaction of surgeons was more with PA than compared with TA. [Relative Risk=1.49, (95% CI: 1.02-2.17)]. On day 1 postoperative complications were greater in TA group (76%) than compared to PA group (64%).Complications associated with anesthetic procedure were more in PA group than compared with TA group.
Conclusions: Patient’s satisfaction was statistically significantly greater in PA group compared to TA group. Surgeon’s satisfaction was also not different from patient’s satisfaction and found to be more with peribulbar block than compared to topical anesthesia. Clinical outcome remains unaffected by either of anesthetic technique.

Keywords: Peribulbar Anesthesia, Phacoemulsification, Topical Anesthesia.


How to cite : Shelke E B, Yerkade H N, Sonepethkar M P, Pradip Bhikshukrao C, Clinical outcomes, surgeon and patient satisfaction following peribulbar versus topical anesthesia for phacoemulsification surgery and intraocular lens implantation- A comparative study. Indian J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018;4(1):16-20

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.