Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Print ISSN: 2395-1443

Online ISSN: 2395-1451

CODEN : IJCEKF

Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (IJCEO) is open access, a peer-reviewed medical journal, published quarterly, online, and in print, by the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF) since 2015. To fulfil our aim of rapid dissemination of knowledge, we publish articles ‘Ahead of Print’ on acceptance. In addition, the journal allows free access (Open Access) to its content, which is likely to attract more readers and citations of articles published in IJCEO. Manuscripts must be prepared in more...

Article type

Original Article


Article page

457- 460


Authors Details

Jignasa Bhabhor, Khushnood Sheikh*, Manisha Patel


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files

   






Article statistics

Viewed: 917

PDF Downloaded: 658


Study of pain in peribulbar anesthesia with buffered and nonbuffered agents


Original Article

Author Details : Jignasa Bhabhor, Khushnood Sheikh*, Manisha Patel

Volume : 5, Issue : 4, Year : 2019

Article Page : 457-460

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijceo.2019.109



Suggest article by email

Get Permission

Abstract

Since many years anesthesia for an eye evolving from retrobulbar to topical. Hyaluronidase is use for
better absorption of anesthetic solution. Due to the enzyme nature of hyaluronidase, cost of the drug, risk
of anaphylaxis and limited shelf life led the search of newer molecule which gives better absorption with
negligible risk and cost effectiveness. As commercially available local anesthetic agents are more acidic
in nature causing more pain to patients and so this study compare the pain perception by buffering the
anesthetic agents with sodium bicarbonate 7.5%.
Objective: To estimate the pain perception of preservative free sodium bicarbonate (7.5%), lignocaine 2
%, bupivacaine 0.5% with hyaluronidase (1500IU) in combination of lignocaine 2% and bupivacaine 0.5%
for peribulbar anesthesia.
Materials and Methods: Prospective interventional study was done on 60 patients over a period of 12
months. Patients were selected randomly who falls under inclusion criteria and were injected freshly
prepared non-buffered (solution-A) or buffered (solution-B) peribulbar anaesthesia. The pH of both
solutions was tested using digital pH meter at the same time. All peribulbar injections were given by
one surgeon only. The pain of peribulbar injection were noted on Wong- Baker FACES20 pain rating scale
during each block. Results were analyzed by independent t - test.
Results: Both the group consist of 30 patients each. 34 were male and 26 were female. Mean pH of
solution A: 6.18 0.13 and of solution B: 7.18 0.14. In first group that is without sodium bicarbonate
40% of patient were having a moderate pain with mean pain score 4.033 + 2.12 and 6.66% of patient were
having moderate pain with mean pain score 1.43 + 1.40 in the second group (with sodium bicarbonate).
Statistical analysis shows P value 0.00001, which was highly significant.

Keywords: Sodium bicarbonate, Hyaluronidase, Peribulbar anesthesia, Pain score Introduction.


How to cite : Bhabhor J, Sheikh K, Patel M, Study of pain in peribulbar anesthesia with buffered and nonbuffered agents. Indian J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019;5(4):457-460

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.